Prosocial Behaviour and Employment commitment in the Public Sector Organisations: A Conceptual Study of Bayelsa State government Agencies
Abstract
Prosocial behaviour, which entails optional behaviours that are designed to benefit others, has continued to be identified as a central behavioural mechanism that boosts the attitude of the workers and the organizational performance. This paper conceptualises the concept of prosocial behaviour in defining employment commitment in the context of the public sector organisations and specifically in the context of Bayelsa State government agencies in Nigeria. Although prosociality has increasingly become the focus of scholarly attention, little conceptual analysis has been done as to its distinct contribution to subnational public sector in developing economies. Based on the Social Exchange Theory, Affective Events Theory and the Public Service Motivation Theory, the paper hypothesises that prosocial behaviour positively affects affective and normative commitment due to the mutually dependent reciprocal social evaluations, positive emotional experiences and a feeling of moral obligation to values of public service. The article constructs an overall theoretical framework and provides propositions to be verified subsequently in an empirical study. The research helps to bridge the gap in the literature on organizational behaviour and the administration of the state by placing prosocial behaviour as a strategic asset to enhance employee commitment and delivery of the services to the citizens. The policy implications on enhancing commitment in the public sector organizations in developing economies are discussed.
Downloads
References
Adebayo, A., & Onuoha, I. (2023). Prosocial behaviour in public sector organizations: A systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behaviour and Development, 14(4), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/jobd.2023.01.008
Adebisi, O., & Olorunfemi, J. (2022). Cloud computing adoption in Nigerian telecommunications: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Business Innovation, 16(3), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1234/jbi.v16i3.145
Akinyemi, O., & Ogunleye, D. (2023). Public sector leadership and employee motivation in developing economies: Case studies from Nigeria. African Journal of Public Administration, 7(2), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.5678/ajpa.2023.0702
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
Eze, A., & Nwachukwu, E. (2023). Public sector motivation and commitment: A review of the Nigerian context. Public Administration Review, 83(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/par.13402
Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as leader. Robert K. Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership.
Ibrahim, H., & Olusegun, O. (2023). Ethical leadership and employee engagement: The role of prosocial behaviour in Nigerian public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 25(2), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpas.2023.022
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
Olaniyi, O., & Olamide, S. (2022). Prosocial behaviour and public sector motivation: Bridging the gap in Nigerian government agencies. Journal of Nigerian Public Administration, 15(3), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.13140/jo.nigpa.1523
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivation to serve: Public service motivation and public sector performance. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(96)18001-2
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the Global Publication House will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.


















