MANAGEMENT PREROGATIVES AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Abstract
Employers and employees have rights and privileges that are guaranteed and protected by laws and for things to go well in the workplace, both must adhere to and respect the same. This study focused on the management’s decision to discontinue the giving of summer incentive pay to the employees. This topic is significant because of the discussion of the circumstances and experiences of the participants who have been affected by the removal of monetary benefits they previously enjoyed. The data used is derived from completed case study.This research study is qualitative in nature and used the doctrinal analysis method because doctrines, statutes, and jurisprudence are analyzed in relation to the factual events that transpired. This analysis provides a solid foundation before beginning any theoretical critique of the law or empirical study about the law in operation, and it is the researcher's responsibility to confirm the legitimacy and status of the legal doctrine being examined. Findings revealed that the laws, and jurisprudence relating to management prerogative are consistent and clear in giving the limitations on the exercise of the management prerogative.
Downloads
References
2) Foz, V.,“Labor Concepts in the New Constitution” in The 1987.Constitution: Its Implications on Employment and Labor Relations [ECOP: Manila, 1987],p. 158.
3) Gomez, G. & Morgan, J.D., (1991). Managerial Prerogatives, Employee Expectations, and Property Rights inJob Security: INstitutionalizing the “New Equity”. INternational JOurnal of Valeu-Based Management, 4,25-43.
4) Hutchinson, T (2013). Research Methods in Law. EBook. ImprintRoutledge.Pages 27. ISBN 9780203489352.
5) Freeman RB and Han E (2012) The war against public sector collective bargaining in the US. Journal of Industrial Relations 54(3): 386–408.
6) Jimenez, Josephus B. The 8 secrets for success to leading and managing people through employee discipline. 2017 (3rd ed,). Q.C.: Central Book Supply (2017) 2v.
7) Jimenez, Josephus B. Compendium on the Philippine labor relations law and jurisprudence (with compendium, analysis and annotations) 2017 ed. Q.C.: Central Book Supply (2017) 1138pA.
8) Kamal, N. A., & Mir, A. (2013). Employment lawin Malaysia. Malaysia: International Law Book Services.
9) Kanamugire, J. C. (2014) The Concept of Managerial Prerogative in South African.
10) Lewin, A. P., Fisher, M., & Weber, B. (2012). Do rainfall conditions push or pull rural migrants: Evidence from Malawi. Agricultural Economics, 43, 191– 204.
11) O’Sullivan, M., Lavelle, J.,Turner, T., McMahon,J.,Murphy, C.,Ryan, L. and Gunnigle, P. University of Limerick, Ireland (2021). Employer-led flexibility,working time uncertainty, and trade union responses: The case of academics, teachers and school secretaries in Ireland. Journal of Industrial Relations 2021, Vol. 63(1) 49– 72.
12) Parasuraman, B. (2014). Employee participationin Malaysia: Theory and practices. Malaysia: UMK PRESS.
13) Radzkii, M. & Parasuraman, B.(2015). Employer’s Managerial Prerogative Right: An Evaluation of its Relevancy to the Employer-Employee Relationship. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 23(11):2227-238.
Jurisprudence
APOLINAR A. ARGENTERA, PETITIONER, VS. MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY/MANNY V. PANGILINAN, RESPONDENTSG.R. No. 225049
Bankard, Inc. V. NLRC, BEU-AWATU, G.R. No. 171664, MArch 6, 2013.
CAONG, ET. AL. V. REGUALOSG.R. No. 179428, (2011)
Coca-Cola Export Corporation v. Gacayan, G.R. NO. 149433. December 15, 2010.
DIONISIO GOMEZ, FE GOMEZ, JUAN GEALONE, LUZ GOMEZ, AQUINO GUETA, DIONISIO GOMEZ, JR., LYDIA ANGELES, MILAGROS GOMEZ, EMILIO T. TRAILGALGAL, CESAR GEALONE, AMADA GOMEZ, RICARDO MANDANAS, ROSE GOMEZ, CONSOLACION ESPELA, NORMA GOMEZ, and CORAZON GOMEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MARCELO GEALONE, LUCIA G. ESBER, ZOILO ESBER, ODEN BONTIGAO, HONORATO BONTIGAO, BENITO GEALONE, CESAR GEALONE, SEVERINO GERONA, TITO GERMEDIA, AURELIO GOBRIS, NEMESIO FORTES, PONCIANO GOBRIS, FLOSERFIDA GONA, and GORGONIO BONTIGAO, [G.R. No. 58281. November 13, 1991.
Eastern Telecommuncations Philippines, v. Eastern Telecoms Employees Unions, G.R.No. 185665, Feb. 8, 2012.
ENDICO vs. QUANTUM G.R. No. 161615, (2009)
JARCIA MACHINE SHOP and AUTO SUPPLY, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION and AGAPITO T. TOLENTINO,G.R. No. 118045 January 2, 1997.
Julie Bakeshop v. Arnaiz, G.R. No. 173882, Feb. 15, 2012.
Isabela-1 Electric Coop, Inc. V. Del Rosario, Jr., G.R. No. 226369, July 17, 2019.
Leus v. St. Scholastica’s College Westgrove, G.R. No. 187226, Jan. 28, 2015.
MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY, PETITIONER, VS. APOLINAR A. ARGENTERA, RESPONDENT. G.R. No. 224729. February 08, 2021
MEGA Magazine Publications, Inc, v. Defensor, G.R. No. 162021, June 16, 2014.
Metropolitan and Trust Company vs NLRC, G.R. No. 152928, (2002)
Pecson v Robinsos Supermarket Corporation. G.R. No. 198534, 3 July 2013.
Philiipine Japan Active Carbon Corporation.
Producers Bank of the Philippines v. NLRC, Prodcuers Bank Employees Association G.R. No. 100701, march 289 2001
SAN MIGUEL BREWERY SALES FORCE UNION (PTGWO), Petitioners, v. HON. BLAS F. OPLE, as Minister of Labor and SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION, vs.Lorenzo F . Miravite, Isidro D. Amoroso for New San Miguel Corp. Sales Force Union, Siguion Reyna, Montecillo & Ongsiako G.R. No. 53515. February 8, 1989.
Copyright (c) 2023 Leo Roswald M. Tugonon et. al.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the GPH Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
