NATIONAL SINGLE WINDOW PLATFORM AND INTEGRATED BORDER RISK MANAGEMENT IN NIGERIA
Abstract
The study rated the National Single Window (NSW) against its role in inter-agency coordination, information-sharing and the performance of Nigeria's borders in terms of its role in integrated border risk management. A quantitative survey yielded 198 valid questionnaires from 240 distributed, and a qualitative survey was conducted through interviews and focus group discussions until thematic saturation was reached. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively to summarize findings, and through correlation analysis and multiple regression. The results showed that while the NSW has advanced the digitalization of border administration, its potential as a platform to integrate risk management systems is only partially realized. The results of the quantitative and qualitative assessments indicated that, despite progress made in the exchange of electronic information and administrative effectiveness, interoperability, coordination of risk assessment, and collaboration among institutions remain weak points. Also, the regression analysis revealed that, there exists a border risk management technology-governance relationship. The ability of the NSW to produce a positive effect on the performance of the border was statistically significant. Still, inter-agency coordination was identified as the most influential determining factor in achieving good outcomes. The study also found some institutional factors that hamper the effectiveness of the NSW. The lack of inter-agency coordination, interoperability between agency information systems, poor data-sharing, mistrust of agencies and lack of capacity remain barriers to collaborative decision-making and integrated risk assessment. Based on the findings, it was suggested that, increasing digital infrastructure capacity should be followed by strengthening institutional integration, which is the priority. Investments in information technology remain relevant in border security will be achieved through interoperable information systems, harmonized risk assessment methods, and formalized inter-agency collaboration. The National Single Window should therefore be developed as an environment in which information can be shared and intelligence exchanged in real time, with the exchange of coordinated risk information.
Downloads
References
Akinola, A. A. (2019). Border governance and national security in Nigeria. Routledge.
Akinyemi, A. (2013). Border security and national development in Nigeria. African Security Review, 22(2), 101–113.
Andreas, P. (2013). Smuggler nation: How illicit trade made America. Oxford University Press.
Bersin, A. (2012). Risk management and modern border governance. Journal of Homeland Security, 9(3), 45–59.
Bowling, B., & Sheptycki, J. (2015). Global policing. Sage Publications.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
European Commission. (2020). Integrated border management strategy. European Commission.
Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world: How globalisation is reshaping our lives. Profile Books.
Grainger, A. (2014). Trade facilitation and customs reform: The politics of border management. The World Economy, 37(1), 1–19.
Haruna, S. (2024). Integrated border management and security governance in developing economies. Journal of Security Studies, 12(1), 44–62.
Igwe, C. (2024). Digital trade platforms and customs modernization in Nigeria. African Journal of Public Administration, 16(2), 88–105.
International Organization for Migration. (2024). World migration report 2024. International Organization for Migration.
Lomba, B. O., Nkoro, E., & Oladosu, I. O. (2024). Risk management and customs operations in Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 11(12), 520–536.
NESREA. (2023). Environmental compliance and border regulatory framework in Nigeria. Abuja: National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency.
Nosiri, C., & Ohazurike, U. (2023). Inter-agency collaboration and border security management in Nigeria. International Journal of Security and Development, 8(1), 55–70.
Okolo, P., Ibrahim, A., & Yusuf, M. (2022). Risk intelligence and customs administration in Nigeria. Journal of African Security Studies, 14(1), 78–95.
Oluwadare, O. (2020). Corruption and border governance in Nigeria. African Journal of Governance and Development, 9(2), 112–129.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
Udeh, F., & Nwokorobia, O. (2022). Border governance and customs efficiency in Nigeria. Journal of African Trade, 9(2), 65–78.
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2022). National single window systems and trade facilitation. Bangkok: UNESCAP.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2023). Single Window Planning and Implementation Guide. UNECE
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2021). Transnational organized crime in West Africa. Vienna: United Nations.
Widdowson, D. (2018). Risk management in customs administrations. World Customs Journal, 12(2), 3–15.
World Bank. (2020). Doing Business 2020: Comparing business regulation in 190 economies. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Customs Organization. (2018). Risk Management Compendium (Vol. 1). Brussels: World Customs Organization.
World Customs Organization. (2021). SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade. Brussels: World Customs Organization.
World Customs Organization. (2024). Guidelines on coordinated border management and digital customs. Brussels: World Customs Organization.
World Health Organization. (2021). Strengthening preparedness for COVID-19 and other public health emergencies at points of entry. Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Trade Organization. (2017). Trade Facilitation Agreement. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
Zakari, S., Zamani, M. A., & Liman, I. (2025). Operational challenges of multi-agency border management in Nigeria. Journal of Security and Policy Studies, 11(1), 77–96.
Zedner, L. (2016). Security. Routledge.
The authors and co-authors warrant that the article is their original work, does not infringe any copyright, and has not been published elsewhere. By submitting the article to GPH-International Journal of Business Management, the authors agree that the journal has the right to retract or remove the article in case of proven ethical misconduct.
