The current state of STEM education in selected lower secondary schools in Hanoi: Challenges and opportunities in implementation

  • Thuan Thi Nguyen Ha Noi Metropolitan University
  • Thuy Thi Nguyen Hai Phong University
Keywords: STEM education, lower secondary schools, teacher training, implementation challenges, Vietnam education reform

Abstract

This study investigates the current state of STEM education in lower secondary schools in Hanoi, with a focus on the challenges, opportunities, and support needs faced by teachers and administrators during implementation. Using a structured survey distributed to 77 participants, including 40 teachers and 15 school leaders, the research explores three core areas: the status of STEM integration, existing barriers, and professional development needs. Results indicate that while teachers recognize the importance of STEM education and show a willingness to adopt it, they face significant obstacles such as limited resources, inadequate training, and difficulties in interdisciplinary integration. Despite these challenges, the demand for further support and training is high, highlighting the urgent need for institutional and policy-level interventions. The findings provide practical insights for educational policymakers, school administrators, and curriculum developers aiming to promote effective and sustainable STEM teaching practices in Vietnamese schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akcan, A. T., Yıldırım, B., Karataş, A. R., & Yılmaz, M. (2023). Teachersʼ views on the effect of STEM education on the labor market. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184730

Apollo, A., & Mbah, M. F. (2021). Challenges and opportunities for climate Change Education (CCE) in East Africa: A critical review. Climate, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9060093

Arshad, A. Y. M. (2021). A systematic review: Issues in implementation of integrated STEM education. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12.

Batdi, V., Talan, T., & Semerci, C. (2019). Meta-analytic and meta-thematic analysis of STEM education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7.

Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2023). Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educ Inf Technol, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w

Bozkurt Altan, E., & Tan, S. (2021). Concepts of creativity in design based learning in STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09569-y

Bush, S. B. (2019). National reports on STEM education: What are the implications for K-12? Trong A. Sahin & M. Mohr-Schroeder (B.t.v), STEM education 2.0 myths and truths: What has K-12 STEM education research taught us? Brill.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association.

Chai, C. S. (2019). Teacher professional development for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: A review from the perspectives of technological pedagogical content (TPACK). Asia Pac Educ Res, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0400-7

Cheng, M. F., Lo, Y. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2024). The impact of STEM curriculum on students’ engineering design abilities and attitudes toward STEM. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09883-9

Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2014). Student perceptions of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) content and careers. Comput Hum Behav, 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.046

Egarievwe, S. U. (2015). Vertical education enhancement–A model for enhancing STEM education and research. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.354

Hán, T. H. T., & Đỗ, H. T. (2023). Tổ chức dạy học dựa trên vấn đề bài học STEM “hiện tượng bay hơi và ngưng tụ” (Khoa học tự nhiên 6) nhằm phát triển năng lực khoa học tự nhiên cho học sinh. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 23(13), 29–35.

Lê, T. N. A., & Lê, T. H. (2024). Tổ chức dạy học phần “Nhiệt” (Khoa học tự nhiên 8) theo mô hình giáo dục STEM nhằm phát triển năng lực giải quyết vấn đề cho học sinh. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 23(đặc biệt 9), 43–48.

Lê, T. T. H., Phạm, K. C., Lê, C. N., Vũ, T. T., & Nguyễ, T. L. N. (2024). Xây dựng tiêu chí đánh giá năng lực dạy học STEM của giáo viên phổ thông tại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 24(11), 110–115.

Matook S, Wang YM, Koeppel N, Guerin S (2021b) Experiential learning in work-integrated learning (WIL) projects for metacognition: Integrating theory with practice. In: Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Virtual conference. Https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2021/77. (không ngày). https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2021/77

Nguyễn, T. N., Trần, T. X. Q., Nguyễn, P. U., & Tạ, T. T. (2022). Một số nghiên cứu về năng lực STEM trên thế giới và đề xuất khung năng lực stem cho học sinh phổ thông tại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 22(10), 48–53.

Nguyễn, T. T., Đào, V. T., & Đỗ, Đ. L. (2023). Xây dựng tài liệu giáo dục STEM hỗ trợ dạy học môn Khoa học tự nhiên trong Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông 2018. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 23(số đặc biệt 7), 128–132.

Published
2025-04-27
How to Cite
Nguyen, T., & Nguyen, T. (2025). The current state of STEM education in selected lower secondary schools in Hanoi: Challenges and opportunities in implementation. GPH-International Journal of Educational Research, 8(03), 249-261. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15290426