UNLOCKING THE POTENTIALS OF LEADERSHIP THEORIES IN PRIVATE SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN RIVERS STATE

  • Maxwell Nwinye Department on Management, Faculty of Management Sciences University of Port Harcourt
Keywords: leadership, transformational leadership. Ohio State studies, managerial grid

Abstract

Secondary schools whether private or government institutions need good leadership to be successful. Participativeand democratic leaders contribute to effective business practices.Most individuals became great leaders in their business or careers through training, education, and team management. Teachers who work with school leaders that are employee centered, practice consideration, and transformational leadership are likely to be satisfied and committed to achieve academic excellence. The function of leadership is to produce more leaders, not followers. Leadership should be elevating and inspiring. Private school directors or owners should encourage teachers by motivating and provides quality leadership that could lead to new heights, in performing their duties. Implementing one leadership theory is not sufficient but a combination of theories is necessary for effective school management. Private school leaders in Rivers State should practice different leadership theories such asOhio State studies, transformational, and transactional to create an environment that promotes academic excellence, staff development, and institutional success.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basit, A., Sebastian, V., & Hassan, Z. (2017). Impact of leadership style on employee performance: Case study on private organization in Malaysia; International Journal of Accounting & Business Management, 5(2): 105- 115.
Billig, M. (2015). Kurt Lewin's leadership studies and his legacy to social psychology: Is there nothing as practical as a good theory? Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 45(4), 440- 460.
Blake, R., &Mounton, J. (1964). The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Gulf publishing company.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
Fiedler, F. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill.
House, R. J. (1971). A path- goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-339.
Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K.H. (1988). Management of organizational behaviour. Prentice Hall.
Kellerman, B. (2012). The end of leadership. HarperCollins Publishers.
Kuchynkova, L. (2013). Managerial leadership style in terms of gender, Social Research, 4 (33), 18-24.
Likert, R. (1967). The human organizations. McGraw-Hill.
Nuhu, K. (2010). Effect of leadership styles on employee performance in Kampala district council. Kampala Press.
Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A., &Sanghi, S. (2007). Organizational behavior. Pearson Education.
Stogdill, R.M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of the literature. Free Press.
Tannenbaum, R. & Schmidt, W. H. (1958). How to choose a leadership pattern. Havard Business Review, 36, 95-101.
Published
2023-12-30
How to Cite
Nwinye, M. (2023). UNLOCKING THE POTENTIALS OF LEADERSHIP THEORIES IN PRIVATE SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN RIVERS STATE. GPH-International Journal of Educational Research, 6(12), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15244899