EMERGENCY PROCEDURES FOR TOTAL LOSS PREVENTION IN SELECTED OIL AND GAS COMPANIES IN RIVERS STATE

  • E. N. Ogbowu Centre for Occupational Health Safety and Environment (COHSE) University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • E. Ugwoha Centre for Occupational Health Safety and Environment (COHSE) University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • V. Amah Centre for Occupational Health Safety and Environment (COHSE) University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
Keywords: Emergency Procedures, Total Loss Prevention, Oil and gas firms, Rivers State.

Abstract

This study examined the emergency procedure for total loss prevention in selected oil and gas companies in Rivers State. Descriptive research design was adopted or the study. Five emergency measures for loss prevention were considered, namely emergency exist procedure, emergency fire-accident prevention procedures, housekeeping procedure, electrical wiring and installations procedure and procedures for handling hazardous materials. Population of the study comprised 1364 field workers in three oil and gas firms in the study area from which 400 were sampled using multistage sampling technique. Questionnaire designed based on 5-point Likert scale was used for data collection and the data were analyzed using mean, percentage, weighted mean and Analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results revealed that the five emergency procedures for total loss prevention considered in the study were available in the sampled companies (mean score > 3.00 critical score). Two, all the five emergency procedures are effective for measuring emergency loss prevention in oil and gas firm in Rivers Sates (materials (mean score > 3.00 critical score) and finally, there is no significant difference in the level of effectiveness of the various procedure for emergency loss prevention in oil and gas firm in Rivers Sates (p = 0.645 > 0.05 significant level). It concluded that there are available and affective measures for emergency loss prevention in oil and gas firms in Rivers state. It was therefore recommended that management of the oil and gas firms should maintain the five emergency measures for total loss prevention in the oil and gas firms within the study area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Campbell, R. (2013). U.S. Structure Fires in Office Properties. Technical Report. Quincy, MA, USA: National Fire Protection Association
Danzi, E., Fiorentini, L., & Marmo, L. (2021). FLAME: A Parametric Fire Risk Assessment Method Supporting Performance Based Approaches. Fire Technology. 57 (2), 721–765.
Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) 101 (2022). Code for Life Safety. Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering
Hall, J. R. (2014). The Total Cost of Fire in the United States. Technical Report. Quincy, MA, USA: National Fire Protection Association
Hasegawa K, & Sato, K., (2008) Experimental Investigation of the Unconfined Vapor-Cloud Explosions of Hydrocarbons. Technical Memorandum of Fire Research Institute, Japan, 12: 1-118
Hassanain, M. A. (2008). Fire Safety in the Design and Operation of Student Housing Facilities. Structural Survey. 26 (1), 55–62. doi:10.1108/ 02630800810857444
Lees F.P., (2000) Loss Prevention in The Process Industry. Butterworth Heinemann 1: 527.
Menon, N.S., (2019) Loss Prevention in Hydrocarbon Facilities. Oil Gas Res 4: 160. doi: 10.4172/2472-0518.1000160
Muhammed F (2022) Comparison of Risk Assessment Methods within the Scope of
Occupational Safety in the Construction Sector, European Journal of Science and Technology No. 18, pp. 272-282, DOI: 10.31590/ejosat.670906
Published
2025-05-02
How to Cite
Ogbowu, E. N., Ugwoha, E., & Amah, V. (2025). EMERGENCY PROCEDURES FOR TOTAL LOSS PREVENTION IN SELECTED OIL AND GAS COMPANIES IN RIVERS STATE. GPH-International Journal of Applied Science, 8(03), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15321789