Boundary Dispute and the Health, Religious, and Political Life of Communities in South-East Nigeria
Abstract
Background: Boundary dispute constitutes a persistent constraint on the institutional dimensions of community life in the South-East geo-political zone of Nigeria, in so far as contested claims over land ownership disrupt access to healthcare, undermine religious practice, and destabilise political authority within affected communities. This study investigated the effect of boundary dispute on the health, religious, and political life of selected communities in the South-East region.
Objective: To establish the extent to which boundary dispute affects the health of the people in the affected communities in the south east geo-political zone of Nigeria, to determine the effects of boundary dispute on religious life, and to identify the effects of boundary dispute on political life of the affected communities.
Methods: The study adopted a descriptive and correlational design involving 400 respondents drawn, through purposive and simple random sampling, from a population of 1,059,431 persons across the affected communities. Data were collected using a structured and validated four-point Likert-scale questionnaire whose health, religious life, and political life subscales returned Cronbach’s alpha reliability indices of 0.87, 0.91, and 0.85 respectively. Analysis was conducted using frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations, and simple linear regression, tested at the 0.05 level of significance.
Results: Findings revealed that 55% of respondents reported that boundary dispute had a strong negative effect on health, 66% reported a strong negative effect on religious life, and 52% reported a strong negative effect on political life. Regression analysis confirmed that boundary dispute exerted a statistically significant negative effect on health (B = .580, β = .544, t = 11.952, p < .001), religious life (B = .389, β = .494, t = 9.372, p < .001), and political life (B = .199, β = .494, t = 6.046, p < .001), such that all three null hypotheses were rejected.
Conclusion: The study concludes that unresolved boundary dispute structurally threatens affected South-East communities by compromising healthcare access, religious practice, and political authority, implying that institutional restoration requires integrated attention to all three domains simultaneously and sustainably.
Downloads
References
Abada, I. M., & Omeh, P. H. (2022). Land management and violent conflict in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. University of Nigeria Journal of Political Economy, 12(2), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7484460
African Union Border Programme. (2013). Delimitation and demarcation of boundaries in Africa: General issues and case studies. Commission of the African Union.
Ajeli, F. C. (2023). Brothers at war: A historical assessment of the implications of communal conflicts on sustainable development of Ezillo–Ezza communities, 2008–2018. Ochendo: An African Journal of Innovative Studies, 4(2), 43–55.
Anierobi, C. M., Obasi, C. O., Obioha, E. E., Onyejegbu, C. D., & Ajah, B. O. (2025). Community land conflicts and pro-poor urban land access in Enugu, Nigeria: Church involvement for social inclusion. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 81(1), Article a10511. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v81i1.10511
Balgah, R. A., Vubo, E. Y., & Neba, S. E. (2025). Do conflicts influence the accumulation of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital? Insights from Cameroon. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 62(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.70003
Best, S. G., & Rakodi, C. (2011). Violent conflict and its aftermath in Jos and Kano, Nigeria: What is the role of religion? Religions and Development Research Programme Working Paper 69. International Development Department, University of Birmingham.
Egobueze, A. (2025). A nation in disarray: Communal conflicts and socio-political instability in Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Social Sciences & Humanities Research, 13(1), 10–20.
Ellison, C. G. (1991). Spiritual well-being: A conceptualization and measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 347–361.
Hassner, R. E. (2003). “To halve and to hold”: Conflicts over sacred space and the problem of indivisibility. Security Studies, 12(4), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410390447617
Hillenbrand, C. (2023). Social cohesion and religiosity: Empirical results from an online survey in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. Religion and Development, 2(2), 213–260. https://doi.org/10.30965/27507955-20230003
Ibenwa, C. N., & Uroko, F. C. (2020). Discourse analysis of religion and inter-communal conflicts and its causes in Nigeria. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 76(4), Article a5617. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v76i4.5617
Kaldor, M. (2007). Religion and civil society: The changing contours of the public sphere. In M. Kaldor (Ed.), Religion and global politics (pp. 1–26). Polity Press.
Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. Oxford University Press.
Kohen, M. G., & Hébié, M. (2018). Territorial conflicts and their international legal framework. In M. G. Kohen & M. Hébié (Eds.), Research handbook on territorial disputes in international law (pp. 5–34). Edward Elgar Publishing.
National Boundary Commission (Establishment) Act, 2006, Act No. 12 (Nigeria). https://lawsofnigeria.placng.org/laws/NATIONAL%20BOUNDARY%20COMMISSION%20_ESTABLISHMENT_%20ACT.pdf
Neupert-Wentz, C. (2025). Traditional authorities, norm collisions, and communal conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 69(2–3), 463–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027241237438
Nwabachili, C. C. (2017). The place of arbitration practice in resolving ethnic and religious violence/conflicts in Nigeria. Global Journal of Politics and Law Research, 5(5), 70–77.
Nwakanma, S. (2021, February 2). 21 killed in Akwa Ibom, Abia boundary clash. Punch Newspapers.
Okeke, U. (2018). Displacement and the destruction of sacred sites in border dispute: Evidence from Nigeria. Cultural Heritage Journal, 5(1), 56–70.
Onwuzuruigbo, I. (2011). Horizontal inequalities and communal conflicts: The case of Aguleri and Umuleri communities of South-Eastern Nigeria. Africa, 81(4), 567–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001972011000659
Pargament, K. I. (2000). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, and practice. Guilford Press.
Petersen, M. E., & Wilkinson, O. (2020). Conflict and health in fragile states. Global Public Health, 15(9), 1306–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1771758
Sakupapa, T. C., & Adehanloye, O. P. (2025). Sacred contradictions: Religion, conflict and peacebuilding in Northern Nigeria. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 81(1), Article a10969. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v81i1.10969
Sampson, O. (2020, June 22). Abia-Akwa Ibom boundary dispute: 4 killed in 4 Abia communities. The Sun Nigeria.
United Nations Alliance of Civilizations. (2019). The United Nations plan of action to safeguard religious sites: In unity and solidarity for safe and peaceful worship. https://www.unaoc.org/resource/united-nations-plan-of-action-to-safeguard-religious-sites/
Uwakwe, S. I. (2023). Boundary conflict management strategies in Nigeria: A critique. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 13(16), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.7176/RHSS/13-16-02
World Health Organization. (2016). Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030.
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
Yusuf, M. (2023). Effectiveness of local faith actors in peacebuilding, development, and humanitarian response: A study of Nigeria’s Middle Belt Region covering the southern parts of Northeast, Northwest, and the whole of North Central geopolitical zones. MyIT Consult Ltd/International Partnership on Religion and Sustainable Development.
The authors and co-authors warrant that the article is their original work, does not infringe any copyright, and has not been published elsewhere. By submitting the article to GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, the authors agree that the journal has the right to retract or remove the article in case of proven ethical misconduct.
