Healing, Heritage and Cultural Sustainability: Traditional Healers in Minangkabau Society
Abstract
Traditional healers preserve and transmit forms of knowledge that extend beyond the treatment of illness. This article examines how Minangkabau dukun, or traditional healers, contribute to cultural sustainability. Drawing on ethnographic observations, conversations with healers in a Minangkabau village community and relevant scholarly literature, the article offers an interpretative analysis of selected healing practices and the cultural meanings associated with them. Particular attention is paid to the Minangkabau principle alam terkembang jadi guru (‘nature, in its unfolding, becomes a teacher’), the interpretation of signs and numerical patterns, and the transmission of medicinal, ritual and textual knowledge. The analysis is informed by Frederick Errington’s account of the sign-oriented character of Minangkabau culture. It suggests that traditional healers help sustain cultural knowledge not only through their therapeutic practices but also by preserving oral narratives, manuscripts, understandings of the natural environment and practices concerned with communal well-being. Their work therefore connects healing with broader processes of cultural continuity and adaptation. Rather than representing an unchanging remnant of the past, traditional healing emerges as one sphere in which inherited knowledge continues to be interpreted and applied within contemporary village life. Further research could examine the position of traditional healers within the increasingly plural medical landscape of Minangkabau communities.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, T. (1966). Adat and Islam: An examination of conflict in Minangkabau. Indonesia, 2, 1–24.
Abdullah, T. (1985). Islam, history and social change in Minangkabau. In L. L. Thomas & F. von Benda-Beckmann (Eds.), Change and continuity in Minangkabau: Local, regional and historical perspectives (pp. 141–156). Ohio University.
American Anthropological Association (2012). Code of ethics of the American Anthropological Association approved November 2012. https://americananthro.org/wp-content/uploads/aaa-code-of-ethics-2012.pdf
Anwar, C. (1997). Hukum adat Indonesia. Meninjau hukum adat Minangkabau. PT Rineka Cipta.
Balick, M. J., & Cox, A. P. (1997). Drogen, Kräuter und Kulturen. Spektrum.
Beratha, N. L. S., Rajeg, I. M., & Sukarini, N. W. (2018). Fungsi dan makna simbolis pohon beringin dalam kehidupan masyarakat Bali. Jurnal Kajian Bali, 8(2), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2018.v08.i02.p03
Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The basics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
de Josselin de Jong, P. E. (1980). Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan: Socio-political structure in Indonesia. Martinus Nijhoff.
Dobbin, C. (1983). Islamic revivalism in a changing peasant economy. Central Sumatra, 1784-1847. Curzon Press.
Errington, F. K. (1984). Manners and meaning in West-Sumatra. The social context of consciousness. Yale University Press.
Graves, E. E. (1981). The Minangkabau response to Dutch colonial rule in the nineteenth century. Cornell University.
Hadler, J. (2009). Muslims and matriarchs. Cultural resilience in Minangkabau through jihad and colonialism. National University of Singapore Press.
Heider, K. G. (2011). The cultural context of emotion. Folk psychology in West Sumatra. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ilyas, A. (2010). Nan empat. Dialektika, logika, sistematika alam terkembang (3rd ed.). Lembaga Kekerabatan Datuk Soda.
James, P. (2015). Urban sustainability in theory and practice. Circles of sustainability. Routledge.
Järvelä, M. (2023). Dimensions of cultural sustainability – Local adaptation, adaptive capacity, and social resilience. Frontiers in Political Science 5, e1285602.
Kleiweg de Zwaan, J. P. (1912). Die Heilkunde der Minangkabau. In Alfred Maaß, Durch Zentral-Sumatra Band 2 (pp. 160-493). Wilhelm Süsserot.
Kreemer, J. J. (1908). Bijdrage tot de volksgeneeskunde bij de Maleiers der Padangsche Benedenlanden. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 60, 438-487.
Leach, E. (1976). Culture & communication: the logic by which symbols are connected. An introduction to the use of structuralist analysis in social anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
Lee, M. R. (2005). Curare: The South American arrow poison. The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh 35(1), 83-92.
Leow, H. M. A. (2026, April 24). The supernatural side of Malayan rice farming. JSTOR Daily. https://daily.jstor.org/the-supernatural-side-of-malayan-rice-farming/
Mardiana Idayu Ahmad, Haron Daud, & Darlina Md. Naim (2015). Malay traditional healing: A review. In Darlina Md. Naim, Mardiana Idayu Ahmad & Zuraidah Mohd Yusoff (Eds.), Nature and traditional healing (pp. 4-8). Universiti Sains Malaysia Press.
Nanda, S., & Warms, R. L. (2007). Cultural Anthropology. Thomson Wadsworth.
Nafis, A. (1988). Ajaran tashawwuf Sheikh Muda Abdul Qadim Belubus [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. IAIN Sultan Syarif Qasim.
Nastiti, T. S. (2020). Dewi Sri dalam kepercayaan masyarakat Indonesia. Tumotowa 3(1), 1-12.
Navis, A. A. (2015). Alam terkembang jadi guru. Adat dan kebudayaan Minangkabau. PT Grafika Jaya Sumbar.
Osman, M. T. (1989). Malay folk beliefs. An integration of disparate elements. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Peletz, M. (1988). Poisoning, sorcery and healing rituals in Negeri Sembilan. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 144, 132-164.
Piah, H. M. (2015). Ilmu perubatan Melayu tradisional dari naskhah-naskhah lama. International Journal of the Malay World and Civilisation, 3(3), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.17576/IMAN-2015-0303-01
Sabatini, F. (2019). Culture as fourth pillar of sustainable development: Perspectives for integration, paradigms of action. European Journal of Sustainable Development 8(3), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n3p31
Sahlins, M. (2022). The new science of the enchanted universe: An anthropology of most of humanity. Princeton University Press.
Saussure, F. de. (2001). Grundfragen der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. Walter de Gruyter.
Schimmel, A. (1994). Deciphering the signs of God. A phenomenological approach to Islam. State University of New York Press.
Sia, A. (2015, July 10). Lost hiker mystery: Did ‘orang bunian’ kidnap Teo Kim Lean? www.star2.com (https://web.archive.org/web/20190929160716/https://www.star2.com/living/2015/07/10/lost-hiker-mystery-did-orang-bunian-kidnap-teo-kim-lean/ ).
Stark, A., & Huszka, B. (2013). Divination, etiology and signs. The case of a Minangkabau healer. Langua. Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 1-17.
Stark, A. (2018). The Minangkabau healers and healing methods: A structural analysis (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Stark, A. (2023). The Padri movement and the adat: A comparative analysis. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 8(3), e002155. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i3.2155
Tas’ady, R., Fanany, I., & Fanany, R. (2013). Sickness ruins the complexion, breeding disappears without gold: Culture and the interpretation of illness among the Minangkabau of West Sumatra. The International Journal of Health, Wellness and Society 2, 31-41.
Turner, V. (1991). The ritual process. Structure and anti-structure (7th ed.). Cornell University Press.
von Benda-Beckmann, F., & von Benda-Beckmann, K. (1985). Transformation and change in Minangkabau. In L. L. Thomas & F. von Benda-Beckmann (Eds.), Change and continuity in Minangkabau: Local, regional and historical perspectives (pp. 235–278). Ohio University.
Wardani (2010). Astrologi dan pengobatan Melayu dalam Kitab Taj Al-Muluk. Al-Banjari 9(1), 87-115. https://doi.org/10.18592/al-banjari.v9i1.922
Watters, E. (2011). Crazy like us. The globalization of the Western mind. Little Brown.
Winstedt, R. O. (2007). Shaman, Saiva, and Sufi. A study of the evolution of Malay magic. Forgotten Books.
Yulika, F. (2012). Epistemologi Minangkabau. Makna pengetahuan dalam filsafat adat Minangkabau. Gre.
The authors and co-authors warrant that the article is their original work, does not infringe any copyright, and has not been published elsewhere. By submitting the article to GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, the authors agree that the journal has the right to retract or remove the article in case of proven ethical misconduct.
