Whistle Blowing Practice and Audit Committee Structure of Quoted Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria
Abstract
The discrepancy and mixed opinions in the literature on the relationship between whistle blowing practice and audit committee structure makes the direction of their relationship ambiguous. Thus, the aim of this study is to empirically explore the relationship between whistle blowing practice and audit committee structure of quoted deposit money banks in Nigeria. data on different types of whistle blowing practice and audit committee structure from 2014-2023 were collected from central bank of Nigeria statistical bulletin, National Bureau of statistics, Federal Inland Revenue Service (Nigeria Revenue Service), and annual reports and accounts of the sampled banks quoted on the floor of Nigerian Exchange Group from the period of 2014-2023. Descriptive statistics, ordinary least square regression analysis, panel unit root test, Hausman test, Lagrange Mult89plier test, Johansen Cointegration test, error correction model with the aid of E-view version 12.0. the empirical results indicate that internal and external whistle blowing practice significantly relate to audit committee independence, explaining about 79.4% and 80.5% of the total variation in audit committee independence. The study therefore conclude that whistle blowing practice significantly relate to audit committee structure and recommends that banks should strengthen their internal and external whistle blowing practice to ensure that employees feel safe and encouraged to report unethical practices. This could involve creating clear policies, establishing confidential reporting channels, and ensuring that there are no repercussion for whistle-blowers.
Downloads
References
Anas, I.A., Hussaini, B., Murtala, A. & Haruna,D. (2026). CEO characteristics, whistle blowing and financial distress of listed financial service companies in Nigeria. Jalinga Journal of Social and Management Sciences, 6(3),64-74
Yousaf, U.B., Jebran, K., & Wang, M. (2021). Can broad diversity predict the risk of financial distress? Corporate governance. The international Journal of Business in Society, 21(4), 663-684
Wang, Q., Pei, X., & Liang, H. (2022). Founder CEO, CEO Characteristics, and firm innovation efficiency: An empirical study of China’s GEM – listed companies. Sustainability, 1(4),1-22
Pham, M.A., Merkoulova, Y., & Veld, C (2023). Credit risk assessment and executives’ legal expertise. review of Accounting Studies, 2(8),2361-2400
Olufemi, O.V., Matthew, A.O., & Motunrayo, A.Y. (2023). As assessment of broad attributes and performance of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 5(2),47-59
Mohmmed, I., Okparachi, J., Yahoya, O.A. & Tauhid, S. 92024). Effect of CEOs gender and tenure on financial distress likelihood of listed Nigerian deposit money banks: Moderated by risk committee gender. Journal of the management Sciences, 391),68-85
Muien, H.M., Nordin, S., O; Badra, B.O. (2022). The effect of CEO reputation on company financial distress: Evidence from
Mujeeb, S.A.A., Ku, N.I.I. & Sitraselvi, C (2026). Corporate governance mechanisms, whistle-blowing policy and real earnings management. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(6),265-282
Shawver, T.J. & Shawver, T.A. (2026). Will corporate governance and whistle blowing provision improve financial responsibility? Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 12(3),155-166
Schultz,D. & Harutyunyan, K(2025).Combating corruption: The development of whistle blowing laws in the United States. Europe and Armenia. International Comparative jurisprudence, 1(2),87-97
Meng, T.P. & Fook, O.S. (2025). Comparative analysis of whistle blower protection legislations in England, USA and Malaysia. African Journal of Business Management, 5(27),11246-11253
Friebel, G. & Guriev, S. (2022). Whistle blowing incentives in firms. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 21(4),1007-1027
Bowen, R.M., Call, A.C. & Rajgopol, S (2025). Whistle-blowing. Target firm characteristics and economic. Consequences. The Accounting review, 85(4),1239-1271
Alleyare, P., Hudait, M., & Pike, R.(2025) Towards a conceptual model of whistle blowing intentions among external auditors. The British Accounting Review, 45(1),10-23
Al-Absy, M.S.M., Kalsmail, K.N.I. & Chandren, S. (2026). Corporate governance mechanisms, whistle – blowing policy and earnings management practices of firms in Malaysia. International journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences, 13(6),917-922
Sani, I. & Mohammed, A. B. (2021). Whistle blowing policy and fraud prevention in Nigeria. Umyu Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, 191),113-130
Nwoke, U.(2026). Whistle blowing as a corporate governance mechanism: South Africa and Nigeria in perspective. Journal of Corporate law studies, 19(2), 421-450
Ali, B. & Ali, B. (2026). Reasons for whistle blowing: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 7(1),37-51
Miceli, M.P. (2024). Whistle blowing research and the insider lessons learned and yet to be learned. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13(4),364-366
Kaptein, M. (2024). From inaction to external whistle blowing: The influence of the ethical culture of organizations on employee responses to observed wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3),513-530
Belk, K.L.(2023). Whistle blowing – is it really worth the consequences? Workplace health & Safety, 61(2),61-64
Osho, A. & Adekanmbi, J.A. (2026). Whistle blowing: A way of fostering accountability and transparency in public sectors in Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research (Social & Management Sciences), 4(6),1-14
Fasua, H.K. & Osifo Osagie, U.I. (2017). Effective whistle blowing mechanism and audit committee in Nigeria banking sector, 5(10,18-26
The authors and co-authors warrant that the article is their original work, does not infringe any copyright, and has not been published elsewhere. By submitting the article to GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, the authors agree that the journal has the right to retract or remove the article in case of proven ethical misconduct.