Metaphor: A Historical Perspective
Abstract
Metaphor has long occupied a central but contested position in the study of language, thought, and communication. Historically, metaphor has been interpreted in two contrasting ways: as a rhetorical ornament used primarily in literary discourse, and as a cognitive mechanism that structures human understanding. This paper examines the historical development of metaphor theory through a literature-based analysis representing different disciplinary and theoretical perspectives. Drawing on works from philosophy, linguistics, discourse studies, and Conceptual Metaphor Theory, the paper traces the evolution of metaphor from its classical formulation in ancient rhetoric through its reinterpretation in modern philosophy and contemporary cognitive linguistics. Particular attention is given to key turning points in the history of metaphor theory, including classical rhetorical accounts, early modern criticism of figurative language in scientific discourse, nineteenth-century philosophical reconsiderations, and the emergence of interaction and conceptual metaphor theories in the twentieth century. The analysis also explores recent developments in metaphor research, including discourse-oriented approaches, evolutionary perspectives on metaphor in language change, and cross-cultural studies of metaphorical conceptualisation. The findings suggest that the history of metaphor theory does not represent a simple linear progression from rhetoric to cognition; rather, it reflects an ongoing tension between viewing metaphor as a stylistic device and recognising its role in shaping conceptual structures and cultural meanings. By synthesising diverse scholarly perspectives, the study highlights the continuing relevance of historical reflection for understanding contemporary approaches to metaphor.
Downloads
References
Alharbi, A. N. (2023). Theoretical evolution of metaphor. Studies in Literature and Language, 26(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3968/13041
Cavalcante, S., Corrêa Ferreira, L., & Gualda, R. (2016). Metáfora: Diferentes perspectivas. Scripta, 20(40), 8–17.
de Lima, A. (2005). A metáfora: Da analogia à técnica de fusão de opostos. Revista Investigações, 18(1), 9–40.
Fabiszak, M., Ritt, N., & Wacker, E. (2021). A historical dynamic approach to metaphor. LaMiCuS, 6, 68–95. https://doi.org/10.32058/lamicus-2022-003
Friedrich, U. (2025). Der Lebensweg: Historische Semantiken einer diagrammatischen Metapher. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 55, 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41244-025-00366-5
Hart, J.-L. (2022). Metaphor: Poetry, philosophy, rhetoric. Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica, 38(2), 666–694. https://doi.org/10.15581/008.38.2.666-94
Huszka, B. (2020). Metaphors of anger in contemporary Bahasa Indonesia: A preliminary study. LingPoet: Journal of Linguistics and Literary Research, 1(1), 26–30.
Huszka, B., Stark, A., Aini, I., & Annisa, R. I. (2024). Makna metafora pada pembelajaran bahasa dan budaya Indonesia di kelas Bahasa Indonesia bagi penutur asing (BIPA). Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 9(2), 443–463.
Huszka, B., Stark, A., Ya’akub, H. Z. H., Abd Rahman, N. E. R. H., & Annisa, R. I. (2025a). Temporal metaphors as a linguistic phenomenon: Conceptual frameworks across different languages. LingPoet: Journal of Linguistics and Literary Research, 6(1), 31–43.
Huszka, B., Ya’akub, H. Z. H., Hassan, R. A. H., Chuchu, S. I. F. H., & Stark, A. (2025b). The metaphorical construction of cultural identity in Malay proverbs. International Journal of Arts and Social Science, 8(4), 124–161.
Huszka, B., Sulaiman, S. H., Sangran, E., Aini, I., & Stark, A. (2025c). Embodied (semi-)universalities and differences in the metaphorical conceptualisation of love and anger: A conceptual metaphor theory study of English and Korean. Global Academic Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 7(6), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajll.2025.v07i06.001
Huszka, B., Aini, I., Stark, A., Sulaiman, S. H., Abd Ghani, L. P., & Akita, Y. (2026). The gravity of lightness: Embodied metaphor, finitude, and ethical reorientation in Stephen King’s Elevation. SSR Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18638995
Makashova, V. V. (2022). Metaphor as an object of linguophilosophical comprehension. Universum: Filologiâ i Iskusstvovedenie, 97(7). https://doi.org/10.32743/uniphil.2022.97.7.14081
Martinengo, A. (2024). Between rhetoric and knowledge: A philosophical account of metaphor from Aristotle to Nietzsche. Itinera, 27. https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/25175
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and conceptual evolution. metaphorik.de, 7, 55–75.
Pleyer, M., Kuleshova, S., & Placiński, M. (2024). Integrating approaches to the role of metaphor in the evolutionary dynamics of language. [Preprint]. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m56cn
The authors and co-authors warrant that the article is their original work, does not infringe any copyright, and has not been published elsewhere. By submitting the article to GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, the authors agree that the journal has the right to retract or remove the article in case of proven ethical misconduct.

Firozpur Jhirka, Haryana, India