FROM LINEAR EXCHANGE TO CIRCULAR COORDINATION: A THEORETICAL INTEGRATION OF REVERSE LOGISTICS INTO SUSTAINABLE MARKETING

  • NNENANYA, DORIS AKUNNE Marketing Department, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Port Harcourt< Rivers State, Nigeria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18823115
Keywords: Sustainable Marketing Theory. Lenear Exchange. Circular Coordination. Reverse Logistics

Abstract

Sustainable marketing theory has traditionally emphasized forward flows of value, focusing on production, consumption, and co-creation, while largely neglecting post-consumption processes and material recovery. Simultaneously, reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain research have provided operational insights into returns, recycling, and remanufacturing, but these studies rarely integrate marketing’s strategic role in coordinating circular flows. Sustainable marketing scholarship has focused primarily on communication, green positioning, and consumer behavior, under-theorizing system-level coordination for sustainability. Addressing this gap, the paper introduces Circular Coordination - a conceptual framework positioning marketing as the orchestrator of both forward and reverse flows across stakeholders. The framework comprises four dimensions: reverse-flow strategic integration, recovery-oriented demand shaping, end-of-life relationship management, and circular stakeholder alignment. Based on this construct, five propositions are developed linking Circular Coordination to enhanced sustainability performance, stakeholder legitimacy, and long-term value resilience. The paper advances sustainable marketing theory by extending its scope beyond linear exchange, bridging marketing and operations scholarship, and embedding marketing activity within stakeholder and institutional contexts. Managerial implications are discussed, highlighting how firms can operationalize Circular Coordination to achieve systemic sustainability while creating competitive advantage. This framework provides a platform for future conceptual and empirical research in marketing and circular economy contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Autry, C. W., Zacharia, Z. G., & Lamb, C. W. (2001). The role of marketing in reverse logistics management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00050.x

Bagozzi, R. P. (1975). Marketing as exchange. Journal of Marketing, 39(4), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297503900406

Belz, F. M., & Peattie, K. (2009). Sustainability marketing: A global perspective. Wiley.

Brodie, R. J., Saren, M., & Lings, I. (2019). Theoretical perspectives on marketing: Past, present and future. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(7–8), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1605942

Del Río-González, P. (2005). Analysing the factors influencing clean technology adoption: A study of the Spanish pulp and paper industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.422

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., & Kannan, D. (2015). Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 603–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012

Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0308-3

Guide, V. D. R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2009). OR FORUM—The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Operations Research, 57(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1080.0628

Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5

Leonidou, C. N., Katsikeas, C. S., & Morgan, N. A. (2013). Greening the marketing mix: Do greeners lead to greener? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(7), 1–15.

Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge University Press.

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302

Papaoikonomou, E., Valverde, M., & Ryan, G. (2011). Sustainability marketing: A critical perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 45(10), 1513–1532. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111159401

Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.495581

Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: Legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qualitative Market Research, 8(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510619733

Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, 84, 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027

Rogers, D. S., & Tibben-Lembke, R. S. (1999). Going backwards: Reverse logistics trends and practices. Reverse Logistics Executive Council.

Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Sage.

Srivastava, S. K. (2008). Green supply‐chain management: A state‐of‐the‐art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x

Stock, J. R., & Mulki, J. P. (2009). Product returns processing: An examination of practices of manufacturers, wholesalers/distributors, and retailers. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(1), 33–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00145.x

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.11.001

York, J. G., Lenox, M. J., & Shapiro, R. D. (2016). Managing the market for sustainability. Strategic Organization, 14(3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015622363

Published
2026-03-01
How to Cite
DORIS AKUNNE, N. (2026). FROM LINEAR EXCHANGE TO CIRCULAR COORDINATION: A THEORETICAL INTEGRATION OF REVERSE LOGISTICS INTO SUSTAINABLE MARKETING. GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 9(02), 92-105. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18823115
Issue
Vol 9 No 02 (2026): GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2026 NNENANYA, DORIS AKUNNE

The authors and co-authors warrant that the article is their original work, does not infringe any copyright, and has not been published elsewhere. By submitting the article to GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, the authors agree that the journal has the right to retract or remove the article in case of proven ethical misconduct.