BOLAJI AKINYEMI: AN “INTER-LECTUAL” OR JUST AN INTELLECTUAL?
Abstract
Bolaji Akinyemi’s enigmatic personality and his perceptive understanding of foreign policy issues has compelled an interrogation into his disciplinary status and academic expertise in the field of international relations. His versatility in the social sciences has incommoded the controversy of specialization in the academia. Akinyemi’s prodigy drives international affairs into the route of international relations thus energizing a healthy debate on the radicalization of various academic disciplines which possess the potential for contending collision. This paper provides a nexus for orthodoxy and idealism, radicalism and conservatism, realism and liberalism. Adopting the analytical approach, the paper submits that conceptual comprehensibility is an elixir for classificatory appropriateness.
Akinyemi’s disputations in many of his work in and outside the academia are sufficient to categorize him as an inter-lectual.
Downloads
References
Dapo Thomas, ‘Bolaji Akinyemi @ 70: A Tribute’, The Nation, Sunday, 1 January, 2012.
Martin Griffiths, Fifty Key Thinkers In International Relations, London: Routledge, 2003, p. 27.
Dapo Thomas, Tribute, 2012.
Donna Lee, Middle Powers and Commercial Diplomacy, Hampshire: England, (NA), pp13-14.
Dapo Thomas, Tribute, 2012.
Bolaji Akinyemi, Essays on Bolaji Akinyemi, Lagos: Nigeria, 2002, p231.
Donna Lee, p21.
Sylvester Monye, ‘Bolaji Akinyemi @ 80: Brilliant and Magnificent’, The Guardian, 2 January, 2022.
Sylvester Monye, 2022.
Nigerian Tribune, Akinyemi’s Bomb, 21 August 1987.
Richard Sennett, The Fall of Public Man, London: England, 1974, p339.
Dapo Thomas, ‘Bolaji Akinyemi @ 80: Another Tribute’, The Nation, Sunday, 16 January, 2022.
Sylvester Monye, 2022.
The authors and co-authors warrant that the article is their original work, does not infringe any copyright, and has not been published elsewhere. By submitting the article to GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, the authors agree that the journal has the right to retract or remove the article in case of proven ethical misconduct.