EFFECTS OF VARIOUS STRUCTURAL DOMAIN OVER FUNDAMENTAL TIME PERIOD OF RC STRUCTURES

  • Sakshi Pandit Bharud SND Collage of Engineering and Research center Yeola, India
  • S.A. Karale SND Collage of Engineering and Research center Yeola, India
Keywords: Number of floors, natural time period (T), response, natural frequency (Fn), Storey height

Abstract

When a structure is subjected to an earthquake, the seismic forces propel the structure into motion and vibrate the structure in different directions. The time that the structure takes for a single oscillation is called the time period. The longest of these is called the natural time period. The natural time lag and damping of the structure has phenomenal effects on the response of structures. According to IS 1893 (2002), the approximate natural time span (T) in seconds is affected by two parameters: the height of the structure and secondly the base dimension of the building. In this study, parameters are examined that, in addition to height and base dimensions, can extend the natural time span of RC structures. The lengthening of the natural time periods leads to an improved response of the RC structure. The time course analysis of various R.C. Imperial Valley (1940) ground motion models were performed using CSI Etabs 2016 and SAP 2000.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nilesh V. Prajapati, “Effect of height to natural time period of multi storeybuilding.”International Journal of Emerging Technologyand Advanced Engineering(IJETAE), volume 2 issue 11, November 2012. 2250-2459.

L.Lin, N. Naumoski, S. Foo and M. Saatciogl, “Elongation of the natural periods of reinforced concrete frame buildings duringnonlinear seismic response.” The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China. October 12-17, 2008,

Abbas Ali Dhundasi, “Equation for estimation of natural time period for elevated water tank”. International journal of civilengineering and technology (IJCIET), Volume 5, Issue 9, September (2014), pp. 266-275. 0976 – 6308

Mehmet MetinKose, “Parameters affecting the natural period of RC buildings with infill walls”.Elseviers Engineering Structures31. September (2009). 093-102.

IS: 456(2000), Indian Standard Code of Practice for Plan and Reinforcement concrete (Fourth Revisions), Bureau of IndianStandards (BIS), New Delhi

IS 1893:2002, Indian standard code of practice for earthquake resistant design , Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi

C.V.R. Murty,IITK, Kanpur, India (Earthquake Tips-10) (2002)

Goel, K. R.and Chopra, K.A., Period formulas for moment-resisting frame Buildings, J. of Struct. Eng., ASCE, Vol.123, 1997,1454-1461.

Minakshi M. Sonawane, Ramdas D. Gore ,Bharti W. Gawali, Ramesh R. Manza and SudhirMendhekar, “Identification of skin disease using machine learning”, ACTIVE, PP NO.1-7,2022.

Arthur C Heidebrecht and NoveNaumoski, “Periods of Reinforced Concrete Frames During Nonlinear Earthquake Response”12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering , Auckland, New Zealand, 30 January - Friday 4 February 2000.
Published
2023-06-25
How to Cite
Pandit Bharud, S., & Karale, S. (2023). EFFECTS OF VARIOUS STRUCTURAL DOMAIN OVER FUNDAMENTAL TIME PERIOD OF RC STRUCTURES. GPH-International Journal of Applied Science, 6(05), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8078987