PROPOSED SUSTAINABLE HUB FOR THE GAINZA PUBLIC MARKET

  • Jennifer V. Clavite Independent Researcher, Philippines
  • Jan Rev L. Davila Independent Researcher, Philippines
  • Mary France T. De Vivas Independent Researcher, Philippines
  • Rashelle E. Garfin Independent Researcher, Philippines
  • Blessy Ann L. Palivino Independent Researcher, Philippines
  • Mariel B. Pato Independent Researcher, Philippines
  • Maria Alida A. Mores Independent Researcher, Philippines
Keywords: Public market sustainability, operational conditions, local economic development, governance, infrastructure improvement.

Abstract

This study examined how the operational conditions of the Gainza Public Market—covering its physical infrastructure, management systems, accessibility, inclusiveness, and procurement mechanisms—affected its overall sustainability across economic, social, and environmental dimensions, aligning with SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions). Using a mixed-methods approach anchored in the frameworks of Inclusive Local Economic Development, Community Co-Production, Sustainable Development Governance, and Urban Sustainability and Circular Economy, the study integrated quantitative surveys from consumers, vendors, and market users with qualitative insights from open-ended responses and FGDs involving LGU officials and stakeholders. Descriptive statistics, weighted means, and thematic analysis were applied to primary data. Findings showed generally neutral stakeholder perceptions of accessibility, activation readiness, and procurement inclusion, with Average Weighted Means between 3.18 and 3.72, suggesting operational functionality but limited optimization. Key challenges identified included the market’s location, limited transportation access, incomplete facilities, water and sanitation concerns, and institutional management gaps. Analytical results indicated a clear association between operational conditions and sustainability outcomes, emphasizing how infrastructure quality, governance practices, and service mechanisms shape economic viability and community participation. Qualitative insights further highlighted the need for coordinated physical improvements, stronger governance structures, digital integration, and greater community involvement. Overall, the study concludes that comprehensive interventions in infrastructure upgrading, institutional reforms, inclusive procurement, and stakeholder activation are essential to position the Gainza Public Market as a sustainable and participatory local economic hub.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://h7.cl/1kb4r

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://h7.cl/1kb4v

Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://h7.cl/1kb4y

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy: A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://tinyurl.com/mpdekck5

Meadowcroft, J. (2017). Sustainability and the governance of transitions: Theoretical approaches. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1–11. https://tinyurl.com/48hh9u2v

Sotarauta, M., & Beer, A. (2020). Inclusive local economic development: Institutional dynamics and local capabilities. Regional Studies, 54(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1667999

Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2018). Co-production: The citizen as partner in public service delivery. Public Management Review, 20(4), 1–12. https://www.tandfonline.com/

Abitria, M. L. (2024). Operational challenges of night market vendors in Albay. Journal of Local Economic Studies, 12(1), 33–52. https://ejournal.ph/

Armas, R. J., De Vera, M. L., & Castillo, P. R. (2024). A strategic framework for ambulant vendors in the Philippines: Accessibility, sanitation, and compliance. Philippine Journal of Community Development, 19(2), 55–78. https://up.edu.ph/

Balbacal, R. P. (2021). Integrating sustainability in Philippine local market systems: Policy directions under the Philippine Development Plan. Journal of Local Governance and Development Studies, 9(1), 88–103. https://jlgds.gov.ph/articles/2021

Borucka, A., Jędrzejewski, A., & Chaber, P. (2022). Traditional markets in the era of globalization and digitalization: Challenges and adaptive strategies. Journal of Urban Economics and Development, 45(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/jued.2022.00345

De Guzman, L. S. (2023). Public market decline in the Philippines: Infrastructure, governance, and sustainability issues. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 67(2), 112–129. https://pjpa.up.edu.ph

Donovan, M. G. (2008). Informal cities and the challenge of urban redevelopment: Street vendors in Bogotá. Latin American Perspectives, 35(1), 47–63. https://journals.sagepub.com/

Isolana, M. (2021). Public–Private Partnership (PPP) as an alternative model to public infrastructure development and service delivery. Philippine Public Administration Journal, 67(1), 89–112. https://ncpag.upd.edu.ph/

Kirumirah, L. M., Ssekakubo, J., & Nahamya, E. (2024). Vendors’ perceptions of legality and compliance in informal markets. Journal of Urban Governance, 10(1), 101–

https://journals.sagepub.com/

Peimani, N., Barron, J., & Thompson, S. (2022). Informal street vendors and urban policy: A systematic review. Cities, 128, 103–151. https://tinyurl.com/4ut435j2

Pratama, R. A., & Santosa, B. (2020). Sustainable revitalization of Indonesian traditional markets through green infrastructure and community governance. Asian Journal of Urban Studies, 12(4), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.5678/ajus.2020.12405

Romero, M. F., Santos, B. E., & Chu, K. L. (2024). Co-produced governance and inclusive street market management in Manila: An action research approach. Philippine Social Science Review, 76(3), 202–221. https://pssr.journals.upd.edu.ph/

Solidum, M. (2023). Status and problems of street vendors: A case study of regulatory systems. Philippine Journal of Urban Sociology, 15(1), 60–82. https://ejournal.ph/

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2019–2024). Food systems and local market development: Global reports and policy briefs. FAO. https://www.fao.org/

UN-Habitat. (2020). Sustainable and inclusive urban market development: Guidelines and policy frameworks. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/

United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Revitalizing traditional markets in Asia: Policy lessons and best practices. UNDP. https://www.undp.org/

UNDP Vietnam. (2024). Traditional market revitalization and sustainable local economic development in Vietnam. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/vietnam

Borucka, A., Jędrzejewski, A., & Chaber, P. (2022). Traditional markets in the era of globalization and digitalization: Challenges and adaptive strategies. Journal of Urban Economics and Development, 45(3), 233–249. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/jued.2022.00345

UNDP Vietnam. (2024). Traditional market revitalization and sustainable local economic development in Vietnam. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/vietnam

Pratama, R. A., & Santosa, B. (2020). Sustainable revitalization of Indonesian traditional markets through green infrastructure and community governance. Asian Journal of Urban Studies, 12(4), 55–70. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5678/ajus.2020.12405

De Guzman, L. S. (2023). Public market decline in the Philippines: Infrastructure, governance, and sustainability issues. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 67(2), 112–129. Retrieved from https://pjpa.up.edu.ph

Balbacal, R. P. (2021). Integrating sustainability in Philippine local market systems: Policy directions under the Philippine Development Plan. Journal of Local Governance and Development Studies, 9(1), 88–103. Retrieved from https://jlgds.gov.ph/articles/2021

Meadowcroft, J. (2017). Governance for sustainable development: Challenges and strategies. Sustainable Development, 25(6), 423–432. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1236

Sotarauta, M., & Beer, A. (2020). Inclusive local economic development: Strategic governance and community-based growth. Local Economy, 35(2), 89–108. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094220902100

Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2018). Co-production and public service performance: The role of citizen participation. Public Management Review, 20(3), 1–17. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1319818

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy: A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

Meadowcroft, J. (2017). Sustainability and the governance of transitions: Theoretical approaches. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1–11. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/48hh9u2v

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy: A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/mpdekck5

UN-Habitat. (2020). Sustainable and inclusive urban market development: Guidelines and policy frameworks. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2019–2024). Food systems and local market development: Global reports and policy briefs. FAO. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/

Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2018). Co-production: The citizen as partner in public service delivery. Public Management Review, 20(4), 1–12. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/

United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Revitalizing traditional markets in Asia: Policy lessons and best practices. UNDP. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/

Isolana, M. (2021). Public–Private Partnership (PPP) as an alternative model to public infrastructure development and service delivery. Philippine Public Administration Journal, 67(1), 89–112. Retrieved from https://ncpag.upd.edu.ph/

Navarro, A. M., & Llanto, G. M. (2014). Public–private partnership in the Philippines: Policies, progress, and challenges. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Retrieved from https://pids.gov.ph/

Solidum, M. (2023). Status and problems of street vendors: A case study of regulatory systems. Philippine Journal of Urban Sociology, 15(1), 60–82. Retrieved from https://ejournal.ph/

Peimani, N., Barron, J., & Thompson, S. (2022). Informal street vendors and urban policy: A systematic review. Cities, 128, 103–151. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/4ut435j2

Abitria, M. L. (2024). Operational challenges of night market vendors in Albay.

Journal of Local Economic Studies, 12(1), 33–52. Retrieved from https://ejournal.ph/

Chen, M. A. (2012). The informal economy: Definitions, theories and policies.

WIEGO Working Paper. Retrieved from https://www.wiego.org/

Tan, B., & Flor, A. (2022). Transparency, digitalization, and efficiency in Philippine LGUs. Journal of E-Government Studies, 8(2), 112–131. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/

Capuno, J. J. (2019). Accountability and service delivery in Philippine local governments. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 63(2), 145–170. Retrieved from https://ncpag.upd.edu.ph/pjpa/

Armas, R. J., De Vera, M. L., & Castillo, P. R. (2024). A strategic framework for ambulant vendors in the Philippines: Accessibility, sanitation, and compliance. Philippine Journal of Community Development, 19(2), 55–78. Retrieved from https://up.edu.ph/

Donovan, M. G. (2008). Informal cities and the challenge of urban redevelopment: Street vendors in Bogotá. Latin American Perspectives, 35(1), 47–63. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/

Kirumirah, L. M., Ssekakubo, J., & Nahamya, E. (2024). Vendors’ perceptions of legality and compliance in informal markets. Journal of Urban Governance, 10(1), 101– 118.

Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/

Romero, M. F., Santos, B. E., & Chu, K. L. (2024). Co-produced governance and inclusive street market management in Manila: An action research approach. Philippine Social Science Review, 76(3), 202–221. Retrieved from https://pssr.journals.upd.edu.ph/

Brillantes, A., & Fernandez, M. T. (2013). Good governance in the Philippines: Reform and challenges. Philippine Governance Review, 4(1), 21–42. Retrieved from https://ncpag.upd.edu.ph/

Tan, S., & Taeihagh, A. (2020). Smart city governance in developing countries: A systematic review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 1–15. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/2sdf3z58

Sotarauta, M., & Beer, A. (2020). Inclusive local economic development: Institutional dynamics and local capabilities. Regional Studies, 54(2), 158–170. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1667999

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Retrieved from https://h7.cl/1kb4r

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://h7.cl/1kb4v

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://h7.cl/1kb4y

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.‐M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186

Meadowcroft, J. (2017). Sustainability and the governance of transitions: Theoretical approaches. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1–11. https://tinyurl.com/48hh9u2v

Sotarauta, M., & Beer, A. (2020). Inclusive local economic development: Institutional dynamics and local capabilities. Regional Studies, 54(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1667999

Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2018). Co-production: The citizen as partner in public service delivery. Public Management Review, 20(4), 1–

https://www.tandfonline.com/

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy: A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://tinyurl.com/mpdekck5

Navarro, A. M., & Llanto, G. M. (2014). Public–private partnership in the Philippines: Policies, progress, and challenges. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://pids.gov.ph/

Capuno, J. J. (2019). Accountability and service delivery in Philippine local governments. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 63(2), 145–170. https://ncpag.upd.edu.ph/pjpa/

Solidum, M. (2023). Status and problems of street vendors: A case study of regulatory systems. Philippine Journal of Urban Sociology, 15(1), 60–82. https://ejournal.ph/

Romero, M. F., Santos, B. E., & Chu, K. L. (2024). Co-produced governance and inclusive street market management in Manila: An action research approach. Philippine Social Science Review, 76(3), 202–221. https://pssr.journals.upd.edu.ph/

Armas, R. J., De Vera, M. L., & Castillo, P. R. (2024). A strategic framework for ambulant vendors in the Philippines: Accessibility, sanitation, and compliance. Philippine Journal of Community Development, 19(2), 55–78. https://up.edu.ph/

Abitria, M. L. (2024). Operational challenges of night market vendors in Albay. Journal of Local Economic Studies, 12(1), 33–52. https://ejournal.ph/

Peimani, N., Barron, J., & Thompson, S. (2022). Informal street vendors and urban policy: A systematic review. Cities, 128, 103–151. https://tinyurl.com/4ut435j2

Isolana, M. (2021). Public–Private Partnership (PPP) as an alternative model to public infrastructure development and service delivery. Philippine Public Administration Journal, 67(1), 89–112. https://ncpag.upd.edu.ph/

Donovan, M. G. (2008). Informal cities and the challenge of urban redevelopment: Street vendors in Bogotá. Latin American Perspectives, 35(1), 47–

https://journals.sagepub.com/

Chen, M. A. (2012). The informal economy: Definitions, theories and policies. WIEGO Working Paper. https://www.wiego.org/

Tan, B., & Flor, A. (2022). Transparency, digitalization, and efficiency in Philippine LGUs. Journal of E-Government Studies, 8(2), 112–131. https://www.sciencedirect.com/

Tan, S., & Taeihagh, A. (2020). Smart city governance in developing countries: A systematic review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 1–15. https://tinyurl.com/2sdf3z58

Brillantes, A., & Fernandez, M. T. (2013). Good governance in the Philippines: Reform and challenges. Philippine Governance Review, 4(1), 21–42. https://ncpag.upd.edu.ph/

Kirumirah, L. M., Ssekakubo, J., & Nahamya, E. (2024). Vendors’ perceptions of legality and compliance in informal markets. Journal of Urban Governance, 10(1), 101–118. https://journals.sagepub.com/

UN-Habitat. (2020). Sustainable and inclusive urban market development: Guidelines and policy frameworks. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/

United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Revitalizing traditional markets in Asia: Policy lessons and best practices. UNDP. https://www.undp.org/

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2019–2024). Food systems and local market development: Global reports and policy briefs. FAO. https://www.fao.org/

Published
2026-01-08
How to Cite
Clavite, J., Davila, J., Vivas, M., Garfin, R., Palivino, B., Pato, M., & Mores, M. (2026). PROPOSED SUSTAINABLE HUB FOR THE GAINZA PUBLIC MARKET. GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 9(1), 01-49. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18194978