Effectiveness of the use of power of attorney to encumber mortgage rights by financial technology (fintech) companies in digital financing schemes

  • Adhitya Rizky Prabowo Extraordinary Member of the Association of Land Deed Officials, Professor of law faculty, University of lampung, Lecturer of the Faculty of Law, University of Lampung
  • I Gede AB Wiranata Extraordinary Member of the Association of Land Deed Officials, Professor of law faculty, University of lampung, Lecturer of the Faculty of Law, University of Lampung
  • Sunaryo Sunaryo Extraordinary Member of the Association of Land Deed Officials, Professor of law faculty, University of lampung, Lecturer of the Faculty of Law, University of Lampung
Keywords: power of attorney, mortgage rights, fintech

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of using a digital Power of Attorney to Encumber Mortgage Rights (SKMHT) by fintech companies in digital financing schemes by identifying the challenges of adapting traditional legal instruments to the dynamics of information technology, particularly concerning the validity of electronic documents and data security. The main issue faced is how to integrate electronic signatures and encryption technology in accordance with the provisions of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), the Mortgage Rights Law, and the principles of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata), while also meeting the supervisory standards set by the Financial Services Authority (OJK). The research method used is normative legal analysis, involving a literature review of relevant laws and legal documents to understand the regulatory framework underlying the implementation of digital SKMHT. The findings indicate that with the adoption of advanced technologies such as data encryption and blockchain, along with the harmonization of traditional and digital legal regulations, the implementation of digital SKMHT can enhance security, transparency, and legal certainty in digital financing transactions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Daffa, M. F., Rahman, S., & Qahar, A. (2023). Kekuatan Pembuktian Tanda Tangan Elektronik sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Perdata. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 4(1), 205-221.

Handoko, R. M., Trisna, B. A. A., Pratama, R. D., & Parhusip, J. (2024). Implementasi Blockchain untuk Keamanan Sistem Pembayaran Digital dan Optimasi Transaksi Keuangan (Studi Kasus Industri Fintech di Indonesia). Teknik: Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Dan Informatika, 4(2), 64-74.

https://www.upitra.ac.id/berita/read/perkembangan-fintech-di-indonesia

Law Number 19 of 2016 on Amendments to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE).

Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection.

Mayana, R. F., & Santika, T. (2021). Legalitas tanda tangan elektronik: posibilitas dan tantangan notary digitalization di Indonesia. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(2), 244-262.

Omiyani, S., Suprapto, S., & Saprudin, S. (2023). Digitalisasi Tandatangan Elektronik pada Akta Notaris. JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(4), 3913-3930.

Seng, D. K. B. (2024). Electronic evidence. Available at SSRN 4964150.

Susanto, E., Antira, L., Kevin, K., Stanzah, E., & Majid, A. A. (2023). Manajemen Keamanan Cyber Di Era Digital. Journal of Business And Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 23-33.

The Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata), specifically Article 1338 on the principle of freedom of contract.

Published
2025-05-28
How to Cite
Prabowo, A., Wiranata, I. G., & Sunaryo, S. (2025). Effectiveness of the use of power of attorney to encumber mortgage rights by financial technology (fintech) companies in digital financing schemes. GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 8(05), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15538851