Overcoming the socio-cultural challenges of refugees in the Mahama Refugee camp
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of socio-cultural challenges experienced by refugees in the Mahama Refugee Camp in Rwanda and proposes potential remedies to these effects. The mixed approach was applied for the collection of data. Questionnaires were administered to 102 respondents, while in-depth interviews were conducted to resource persons in the refugee camp. The Sociocultural theory by Vygotsky (1979) was employed to inspire the trend of research. This study used the purposive and random sampling to select research participants. Refugees were purposely selected to provide information about linguistic, cultural and communication challenges that they experience in the camp. The analysed data reveal a significant degree of socio-cultural challenges faced by refugees in the Mahama Refugee Camp. 82.4% of the refugees have language differences which make communication difficult.A considerable proportion of respondents (67.6%) reported experiencing culture shock, manifested primarily in feelings of isolation (75.5%) and heightened stress and anxiety (88.2%). Attitudes towards cultural integration were also assessed, with a small minority (23.5%) expressing support and a large majority (76.5%) preferring to maintain their cultural distinctiveness. The researchers recommend intercultural communication and integration workshops to make the camp a harmonious and comfortable place for all refugees.
Downloads
References
Adler, S. P. (1975). The transitional experience: An alternative view of culture shock. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 15(4), 13–23. DOI: 10.1177/002216787501500403
African Union. (2015). Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want. Retrieved on November 8, 2024, from: https://au.int/sites/default/files/documents/36204-docagenda2063_popular_version_fr.pdf
Allwood, J. (1985). Intercultural Communication. Papers in Anthropological Linguistics. University of Göteborg, Dept of Linguistics.
Andrade, S. M. (2006). International students in English-speaking universities. Journal of Research in International Education, 5(2), 131–154. DOI: 10.1177/1475240906065589
Ayyoub, M., S. Khan & A. Riaz (2019). Qualitative analysis of cultural adjustment issues in Austria. New Horizons, 13(1), 31–50.
Baxter, P. & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
Church, T. A. (1982). Sojourner adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3): 540–572. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.91.3.540
Winkelman, M. (1994). Cultural Shock and Adaptation. Journal of Counselling and Development, 72(4), 369–378. DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1994.tb01723.x.
Ferraro, K. F. (1990): Gerontology: Perspectives and Issues.
Furnham, A. (1984). Tourism and culture shock. Annals of Tourism Research, 11(1): 41–57. DOI: 10.1016/0160–7383(84)90095-1.
Furnham, A. (2010). Culture shock: Literature review, personal statement and relevance for the South Pacific. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 4(2): 87–94.
Gudykunst, W. B. & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with Strangers: An Approach to Intercultural Communication (4thEd). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gudykunst, W. B. (2003). Intercultural communication: Introduction. In Gudykunst, W. B. (Ed).Cross-cultural and intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, pp. 163–166.
Hailu, T. E., and H. Ku (2014). The adaptation of the Horn of Africa immigrant students in higher education. The Qualitative Report, 19(28): 1–19. Retrieved 20 November 2024 from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss28/1
Hotta, J. & Ting-Toomey, S. (2013). Intercultural adjustment and friendship dialectics in international students: A qualitative study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37,550–566
IRC. (2023). Refugee facts, statistics and FAQs. Refugee facts, statistics and FAQs | International Rescue Committee (IRC)
Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming Intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kohls, L. R. (1984). The Values Americans Live.
Mesidor, K. J. & F.K. Sly (2016). Factors that contribute to the adjustment of international students. Journal of International Students, 6(1), 262–282.
Oberg, K. (1960). Cultural shock: Adjustment to new cultural environments. Curare, 29(2): 142–146. DOI: 10.1177/009182966000700405
Renan, S. R. (2014). Culture Shock an obstacle for EFL learners. Procedia – Social and BehaviouralSciences, 144, 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.032
Samovar, A.L., E. R. Porter, R. E. McDaniel & S. C. Roy (2013). Communication between Cultures (8th Ed). Boston: Cengage.
UNHCR,(2023). UNHCR-Rwanda Operational Update. Report.
UNHCR. (2005). UNHCR-Rwanda Operational Update. Report.
UNHCR. (2019). Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status and Guidelines on International Protection. Geneva.
UNHCR. (2021). Master glossary of terms. Geneva: (https://www.unhcr.org/glossary/ , accessed 15 November 2024).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). Consciousness as a Problem in the Psychology of Behaviour. Soviet Psychology, 17(4), 3–35.
WHO. (2022). World report on the health of refugees and migrants. ISBN 978-92-4-005449-3
Winkelman, M. (1994). Cultural shock and adaptation. Journal of Counselling and Journal of Counselling and Development, 72(4), 369–378. DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1994.tb01723.x
Yan, K. &Berliner, C.D. (2011). Chinese international students in the United States: Demographic trends, motivations, acculturation features and adjustment challenges.
Yeo, C. (2016). What is the legal definition of “Refugee”? Retrieved on 5 December 2024 from https://researchingrefugees.com/what-is-the-legal-definition-of-refugee/.
Zhang, J. & Goodson, P. (2011). Predictors of international students’ psychosocial adjustment to life in the United States: A systematic review. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(2), 139–162
The authors and co-authors warrant that the article is their original work, does not infringe any copyright, and has not been published elsewhere. By submitting the article to GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, the authors agree that the journal has the right to retract or remove the article in case of proven ethical misconduct.