Gender Differences in Students’ Mobile Phone Utilization in Rural and Urban Location in Delta State
Abstract
The study examined gender differences in students’ mobile phone utilization in rural and urban location in Delta State. 130 three hundred level (300L) undergraduates in the Department of Science Education, Faculty of Education, Delta State University (DELSU), Abraka and University of Delta (UNIDEL), Agbor, comprised the study’s population. Krejcie and Morgan’s (1970) sample determination table was used to select 97 samples for the study. Data were collected using a questionnaire titled “Students’ Utilization of Mobile Phones (SUMP)”. The instrument was validated by three experts to enhance the quality and credibility of the instrument by reducing bias, identifying errors or omissions and ensuring consistency. The reliability coefficient (0.74) of the questionnaire was ascertained using Cronbach Alpha. Data obtained with the aid of the instrument was analysed using t-test at 0.05 level of significant. The results revealed that that there is a significant difference between mobile phone utilization of male and female students from rural location, as well as urban location, in favour of male students. The results, again, revealed that there is a significant difference between mobile phone utilization of male students, as well as female students, from rural and urban location, in favour of male and female students from urban location. It was concluded that gender differences exist in the utilization of mobile phones among students residing in rural and urban locations in Delta State. It was thus, recommended among others, that to bridge the gender gap in mobile phone utilization, educational institutions and policymakers should design gender-sensitive initiatives focused on promoting equitable access and usage of mobile phones among students in both rural and urban locations.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, M., & Qureshi, I. A. (2015). Gender difference in the usage of mobile phone apps. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 55(3), 41-49.
Awan (2017). Gender differences in social media usage: A comparative analysis of four countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 958-967.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2018). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
Brown, C., Czerniewicz, L., &Nokelela, P. (2016). The mobile learning disconnected initiative: Exploring factors associated with educators' use of mobile learning in higher education. International Review of Education, 62(2), 205-228.
Bulut, S., Gungoren, R., &Cirak-Kisioglu, O. (2015). A study on the mobile phone ownership of university students. International Journal of Education Technology and Information Systems, 2(4), 180-187.
Carrison, B., & Kim, W. (2017). Gender differences in mobile phone use and perceptions among undergraduate students. Journal of Web Librarianship, 11(3), 160-181.
Chen, W. (2016). Gender difference in mobile phone use among young adults in China. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(11), 684-690.
Ching, D. (2017). Mobile learning: Definitions, benefits and challenges. In T. Amiel & D. Wilson (Eds.), Mobile learning in higher education (pp. 3-20). New York: Springer.
Dane, L. (2012). Economic inequality in rural areas: A new frontier. Rural America, 27(2), 3-12.
Egbule, E. O. (2020). Social determinant of rural secondary school students’ choice of agricultural career and its implication for counselling services: Acase study of Delta State. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 10(1), 515-527
Fairlie, R. W., Robinson, J.C., & Ruíz-Valenzuela, J. (2014). Does parental broadband adoption increase children's digital literacy? The effects of home high-speed internet access on academic outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 38, 122–134.
Hemsley-Brown, J., & Foskett, N. (2013). The mobile learning phenomenon in higher education. European Journal of Marketing, 47(3/4), 617-633.
Iroriteraye-Adjekpovu, J. I. (2022). Interactive radio response (IRR) effectiveness in small-class size chemistry achievement. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 35(3), 32-38.
Iroriteraye-Adjekpovu, J. I. (2013). Quality information and communication technology (QICT) in the classroom: Implication for virtual classroom for national values and development. DELSU Journal of Educational Research and Development, 12(1), 108-115.
Iroriteraye-Adjekpovu, J. I. (2012). Blended-teaching methodology for quality assurance in education for adult and youth of basic education system in Nigeria. Research in Education, 18(1), 138-142
International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2020). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2020. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactSheet-Digital-Education-2020.pdf.
Karim, N. R. (2016). Gender differences in mobile phone usage among university students: Evidence from a developing country. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 914-922.
Kim, H., & Seo, D. (2013). Mobile devices for learning: What factors are associated with high school students' mobile learning experience? British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 250-263.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Lawrence, K. C. &Egbule, E. O. (2021). Can emotional intelligence training cause a cease in tobacco smoking among school-going adolescent? International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 26(1), 356-366.
Lee, S. & Abdel-Wahab, M. S. (2019). Gender differences in the use of mobile phones for educational purposes among university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(5), 644-654.
Lenhart, A. (2015). Mobile messaging and social media 2015: Pew research center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/.
Ling, R. (2012). Phones that bind: The affordances of mobile communication. New York: MIT Press.
Liu, J., Zhang, H., Zhao, L., Du, J., & Zheng, L. (2017). Generalized learning for education information extraction in rural communities and its application in mobile content categorization. Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal, 6(4), 71-79.
Liu, T. C., & Chen, W. F. (2018). Exploring the influential factors in students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning system: A study based on the gender differences. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 11(2), 1-17.
Misra, S., & Mondal, J. (2019). Gender differences in mobile phone usage patterns among college students in India: Learning activities and educational engagement. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(12), 4-18.
Mittelbrun, L. S., & Moline, J. L. (2018). Beyond gendered behaviors: Gender differences in device ownership, access and usage patterns in Sub-Saharan Africa. Information Technologies & International Development, 14(4), 27-47.
Osuji, C. (2017). Survey research: A case of job satisfaction survey in higher education. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(19), 98-104.
Smith, H. J. (2017). Gender and technology. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 175-196.
Sultan, F. (2018). Factors affecting Mobile Phone Use for academic purposes among university students. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(2), 1-23.
UNESCO. (2015). Policy guidelines for mobile learning.https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243206.
UNESCO. (2019). I'd blush if I could: Closing gender divides in digital skills through education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf000036782.
Wara Udaya, S., & Priyanthi, S. M. (2018). Nurses' perception on effective use of mobile phone in nursing education. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering (IJoCSE), 10(5), 71-79.
Zhang, Y., Zhao, L., Yang, G., Peng, Z., & Li, P. (2014). Urban-rural digital divide in the use of information and communication technologies: Evidence from China. Chinese Sociological Review, 47(3), 98-118.
The authors and co-authors warrant that the article is their original work, does not infringe any copyright, and has not been published elsewhere. By submitting the article to GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, the authors agree that the journal has the right to retract or remove the article in case of proven ethical misconduct.
Firozpur Jhirka, Haryana, India
