Protectionism Versus Liberalism in International Trade: Navigating Policy Choices for Africa’s Sustainable Economic Development

  • Uzowuru Adolphus Emeka The Institute of International Trade and Development, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State Nigeria
  • Mojekwu, Ogechukwu Rita Department of Finance and Banking, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State Nigeria.
Keywords: Protectionism, Liberalism, AfCFTA, Africa, Trade Policy, Economic Development, Global Trade, Industrialization

Abstract

This study examines the ongoing debate between protectionism and liberalism in international trade, focusing on their implications for Africa’s economic development. African nations face the dual challenge of fostering domestic industries while integrating into the global economy, making the choice between protectionist and liberal trade policies crucial for sustainable growth. Protectionism, often employed to safeguard nascent industries, can foster short-term industrial development but risks inefficiency and market isolation if overextended. Conversely, trade liberalism promotes competition, foreign direct investment (FDI), and integration into global value chains, yet it may expose vulnerable industries to overwhelming foreign competition. Countries can choose to implement more liberal or protectionist policies. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) represents a hybrid approach, offering trade liberalization within Africa while allowing flexibility to protect strategic sectors. Using a blend of recent literature and case studies, this study explores how a balanced trade policy—combining selective protectionism with elements of liberalism—can enhance industrial growth, innovation, and competitiveness across in African economies. The study underscores that no single approach; protectionism or liberalism is universally applicable or inherently bad; rather, trade policies should be tailored to each country’s unique economic context and development stage. Furthermore, African nations should adopt a protectionist stance initially to safeguard emerging industries and develop their competitiveness before pursuing a liberal approach to world trade. Alternatively, they could adopt a protectionist stance in certain economic sectors while maintaining a liberal stance in others to maintain competitiveness in those vital sectors that are crucial to Africa's development. Ultimately, AfCFTA presents a viable framework for advancing Africa’s economic integration and positioning the continent more strategically in global trade.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adejo, A. (2003). The root of globalization: A historical review. Journal of Globalisation, 1(1).
Adenikinju, A. (2019). The automotive industry in Nigeria: Progress and challenges. African Economic Development Review, 14(1), 30-45.
African Union. (2022). African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) progress report. Retrieved from https://au.int/en/afcfta
Alade, B. (2023, May 19). Nigeria’s new policy to promote growth, NADDC affirms. Retrieved from https://guardian.ng/news/nigeria/nigerias-new-auto-policy-to-promote-growth-naddc-affairms/
Aryeetey, E., &Moyo, N. (2012). Industrial policy in Ghana and South Africa: Lessons for African policymakers. World Bank.
Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121-2168. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2121
Baldwin, R. (2016). The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. Harvard University Press.
Baldwin, R., &Evenett, S. (2020). Revitalizing trade policies for sustainable development. Oxford University Press.
Black, A., &Bhanisi, S. (2020). Industrial policy in South Africa: Automotive industry case study. Journal of Economic Policy in Developing Countries, 25(2), 89-110.
Chang, H. J. (2003). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. Anthem Press.
Girma, M. G. (2017). International Trade Theories and its Trends.
Greespan, A. (2001). International trade: Globalization vs. protectionism. Vital Speeches of the Day, 67(13), 386–388.
Heckscher, E., & Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Harvard University Press.
Henderson, D. (2004). Globalization, economic progress, and new millennium collectivism. Globalization, Economic Progress, and New Millennium Collectivism: World Economics, 5(3), 43–73.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1989). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition (2nd ed.). HarperCollins.
Krugman, P. (1979). Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 9(4), 469-479.
Krugman, P. R., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2018). International economics: Theory and policy (11th ed.). Pearson.
List, F. (1841). The national system of political economy. Longman.
Mkandawire, T., & Soludo, C. C. (1999). Our continent, our future: African perspectives on structural adjustment. IDRC.
Mkandawire, T. (2015). Neopatrimonialism and the political economy of economic performance in Africa: Critical reflections. World Politics, 67(3), 563-612.
Ogbonnaya, U. M. (2018). The impact of protectionist policies on Nigeria's automotive industry. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 27(3), 328-346.
Orinya, S. (2023). Liberalism and protectionism in international trade: African political economy in the twenty first century, theories, perspectives, and issues.
Ossa, R. (2021). A simple model of trade, productivity, and growth.Journal of International Economics, 129, 103412.
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. John Murray.
Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L'Ouverture Publications.
Rodrik, D. (2007). One economics, many recipes: Globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton University Press.
Rodrik, D. (2018). Straight talk on trade: Ideas for a sane world economy. Princeton University Press.
Sally, R. (2008). The political economy of trade policy reform: Lessons for developing countries. Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy, 2(2), 55–96.
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W.W. Norton & Company.
UNCTAD. (2023). Economic development in Africa Report 2023: Rethinking the foundations of export diversification in Africa. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
Wolf, M. (2004). Why globalisation works: The case for the global market economy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
World Bank. (2018). The changing nature of work. World Development Report 2019. https://www.worldbank.org
World Bank (2020). The African Continental Free Trade Area: Economic and distributional effects. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Trade Organization. (2021). World trade report 2021: Economic resilience and trade. Geneva: WTO.
Published
2024-10-30
How to Cite
Adolphus Emeka, U., & Ogechukwu Rita, M. (2024). Protectionism Versus Liberalism in International Trade: Navigating Policy Choices for Africa’s Sustainable Economic Development. GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 7(09), 36-54. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14011558