ANALYSIS OF CONFLICT ON THE FEMALE GENDER IN NIGERIA AND THE HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION
Abstract
This research delves into the profound impact of conflicts on women and children, with a specific focus on the North Eastern region of Nigeria. Conflict situations disrupt the lives of women and children in numerous ways, leaving them vulnerable to physical, emotional, and economic hardships. This study aims to shed light on the role played by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in mitigating the vulnerabilities faced by women and children during and after conflicts. It also evaluates the effectiveness and sustainability of post-conflict rehabilitation strategies.
The research employs a qualitative methodology, incorporating focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, and key informant interviews with various stakeholders, including community leaders, religious leaders, and members of humanitarian organizations. The study population comprises individuals affected by conflicts in five states within the North East region of Nigeria.
The findings of this research will contribute to a deeper understanding of the multifaceted challenges faced by women and children during conflicts and the crucial role of international humanitarian organizations like the ICRC in alleviating their suffering. Additionally, it explores the need for greater awareness and adherence to international humanitarian law to protect the rights and dignity of vulnerable populations in conflict zones.
Downloads
References
1949 Geneva Conventions, Articles 2 and 3.
1949 Geneva Conventions, Common Article 3(1), (1949). Today, Common Article 3 also applies as a minimum customary law in international armed conflicts (see Paust (2005)).
Adejoh Reuben (2007) “the Impact of war on women and children: the role of Humanitarian Organizations in Africa. Published in Issues in mass communication and society. P 113.
Adeniyi, (2000). The Impact of Political Violence on Women published in Journal of Institute for Development Research, Ahmadu Bello University.
Adler, Emanuel. 1997. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 3:3, 319, 322.
Article 13(2), Additional Protocol II.
Article 13.3, Additional Protocol II.
Article 48, Additional Protocol I of 1977.
Article 50.1, Additional Protocol I.
Article 51 of the 1977 AP I states “In case of doubt whether a person is a civilian, that person shall be considered a civilian.”
Fenrick, William J.2007. “The Targeted Killings Judgment and the Scope of Direct Participation in Hostilities,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5.
Finnemore, Martha. 1999. “Rules of War and Wars of Rules,” from John Boli (ed), Constructing World Culture, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 151
I.C.R.D.Bulletin,October,1991.
I.C.R.D.News,No.34,23 August,1995.
Icrc(2008). http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList288/FAFDE5C21CBC5ACDC1256B66005B0E39
International Committee for the Red Cross, “Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law: Legal Protection of Children in Armed Conflict,” ICRC website (last accessed 4/6/2009).
International Committee for the Red Cross. “Developments in U.S. Policy and Legislation Toward Detainees: The ICRC Position,” http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/ siteeng0.nsf/ html/kellenberger-interview-191006
International Committee for the Red Cross. 2009. Interpretative Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities. Geneva: ICRC. 45.
International Committee for the Red Cross. 2009. The ICRC: Its Mission and Work. Geneva: ICRC. 6
International Committee on Red Cross (ICRC) (unpublished .manuscript) 1999-2002.
International Committee on Red Cross (ICRC) Annual Report,1996 P. 76
Jaworski, Eric. 2003. “’Military Necessity’ and ‘Civilian Immunity’: Where’s the Balance?,” Chinese Journal of International Law 2:1, 179; Valentino, Benjamin, Paul Huth and Sarah Croco. 2006. “Covenants without the Sword: International Law and the Protection of Civilians in Times of War,” World Politics 58
Jaworski, Eric. 2003. “’Military Necessity’ and ‘Civilian Immunity’: Where’s the Balance?,” Chinese Journal of International Law 2:1, 179
Johnson, James Turner. 2000. “Maintaining the Protection of Non-Combatants,” Journal of Peace Research, 37:4, 427
Johnston, Iain.2001. “Treating Institutions as Social Environments,” International Studies Quarterly 45:4, 494
Katerina, T. (1996) Human Rights and Wars of Starvation, Zed Books Ltd. London P.76.
Katzenstein, Peter J..1996. “Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security,” in Peter J. Katzentesin (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, 14
Kellenberger, Jakob. 2009. International Committee for the Red Cross. Interpretative Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities. Geneva: ICRC. 5.
Kinsella, Helen M. 2005. “Discourses of Difference: Civilians, Combatants and Compliance with the Laws of War,” Review of International Studies 31, 175
Kinsella, Helen M. 2005. “Discourses of Difference: Civilians, Combatants and Compliance with the Laws of War,” Review of International Studies 31, 17
Kinsella, Helen M. 2005. “Discourses of Difference: Civilians, Combatants and Compliance with the Laws of War,” Review of International Studies 31, 175
Kinsella, Helen M.2006. “Gendering Grotius: Sex and Sex Difference in the Laws of War,” Political Theory 34:2
Kleffner, Jann K.. 2007. “From ‘Fighters’ to ‘Fighters’ and Civilians Directly Participating in Hostilities- on the Principle of Distinction in Non-International Armed Conflict One Hundred Years after the Second Hague Peace Conference,” Netherlands International Law Review 54, 316
Kleffner, Jann K.. 2007. “From ‘Fighters’ to ‘Fighters’ and Civilians Directly Participating in Hostilities- on the Principle of Distinction in Non-International Armed Conflict One Hundred Years after the Second Hague Peace Conference,” Netherlands International Law Review 54, 316
Kratochwil, Friedrich and John Gerard Ruggie. 1986. “A State of the Art on an Art of the State.” International Organization 40:4.
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1989. Rules, Norms and Decision, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61
Landolt, Laura K.2004. “(Mis)Constructing the Third World? Constructivist Analysis of Norm Diffusion,” Third World Quarterly 25:3, 584
Lieber Code, Article 21 339 Lieber Code
Marion Harroff- Tavel: Neutrality and Impartiality on the Importance and Difficulty for the International Movement of the Red Cross and Crescent,IRRC,No.273 Nov.-Dec.1989,P.538.
Mearsheimer, John.1995. “The False Promise of International Institutions,” in Michael E. Brown, Sean M. Lynn-Jones, and Steven E. Miller (eds.), The Perils of Anarchy, Cambridge: MIT Press, 375
Michael Cranna (Ed). The True Cost of Conflict, 1994 P.40
Mugabe Delfina (2003)“The Impact of Armed Conflict on Women: The Mozambican Experience”SADC media Training workshop on covering violence Against women(Internet).
Nabulsi, Karma. 2001. “Evolving Concepts of Civilians and Belligerents: One Hundred Years after the Hague Peace Conference,” in Simon Chesterman (ed.), Civilians in War, Boulder: Lynne Riener, 12.
Nabulsi, Karma. 2001. “Evolving Concepts of Civilians and Belligerents: One Hundred Years after the Hague Peace Conference,” in Simon Chesterman (ed.), Civilians in War, Boulder: Lynne Riener, 12.
Copyright (c) 2023 ADEJOH REUBEN, AJINDE OLUWASHAKIN PhD & ILOH EMEKA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the GPH Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
