EFFECT OF COLCHICINE ON QUALITY AND MORPHOLOGY ON ZEA MAYS PROPERTIES
Abstract
At Omar Mukhtar University, an experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of treating Zea Mays with varying concentrations of colchicine. The experiment was designed using random sectors in three replications at concentrations of 0.0%, 0.15%, 0.20%, and 0.10% (control). The obtained results demonstrated a substantial change in the characteristic of plant height and, at concentration, a superior characteristic of average height of 0.20 percent. Significant variations were also observed in the leaf area, with the best outcome occurring at 0.20% concentration. Additionally, the variation in the average sort of the plant's properties, which was significant at 0.20% concentration, accounts for the average length of the cob as well as the average diameter, chlorophyll A and B, and chlorophyll B averages. There were notable variations in the average characteristics of each of the following: average weight of cobs/ha, average weight of cobs/plant, average number of grains per row/cob, average number of cobs per plant, and average weight of cobs/ha, according to the study of the quantitative characters and their effect on colchicine treatment. The average sort of plant for each attribute showed significant differences, with the average Colchicine treatment at a concentration of 0.20% being preferable. However, the average weight of 100 grains showed no significant changes between the average treatments.
Downloads
References
Barnabas B., Obert B. and Kovacs G. (1999) Colchicine, an efficient genome-doubling agent for maize (Zea Mays L.) Plant Cell Reports volume 18, pages858–862
Comez, K,A and A.A, Gomez (1984) statistical procedures for Agricultural research, John Wily and Sons,N,Y.80P
Haudhary A. (1983), Maize in Pakistan Punjab. Agr. Research coordination board Univ. of Agri. Faisalabad
Koch , E, C. and J.T.Mecken (1924) The chemical analysis of food and feed products J.AmerSoc 46 , 2066.
Larry D. N. (1971). Physiology and developmental effects of Colchicine.;Plant and cell physiology , 12 (5), 759 – 770
Nafziger E. D. (2008), Soil, plant growth and production. Vol.1 Growth and production Maize; Mechanized cultivation.Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Goodwin, Urbana IL 61801, USA.
Ngoc C. D., Magali M., Ingrid A., Wen R., and Peter S. (2012) Inducer line generated double haploid seeds for combined waxy and opaque 2 grain quality in subtropical maize (Zea Mays. L.) Euphytica (2012) 183:153–160
Shinners K. J.,. Binversie B. N., Muck R. E. and Weimer P. J. (2007), Comparison of wet and dry corn stover harvest andstorage. Biomass Bioenergy 31 ; 211-221
Singh S. K., Lal S. S., and Singh R. K. (2001) Production Potential of Potato and Maize Inter-cropping as Influenced by Spacing, Planting Pattern and Staggered Sowing of Maize., Journal of AgriSearch 2(3): 167-174
Snedecor , G.W and W.G Cochran (1967) statistical method , (6thed) oxford and IBH.Pnp. Co New.
Wrigt , J.W (1976) introduction to forest Genetics Academic press New York pages 415-417.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the GPH Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.