MODELLING CRUDE OIL PRICE VOLATILITY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NIGERIAN ECONOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ASYMMETRIC GARCH AND LONG SHORT-TERM MEMORY (LSTM) MODELS
Abstract
This study models the volatility of the global Brent crude oil price and examines its implications for the Nigerian economy, which depends heavily on crude oil exports for fiscal revenue and foreign exchange earnings. Using a monthly Brent crude oil spot price series (Europe) obtained from the U.S. Energy Information Administration via the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) database, spanning May 1987 to July 2026 (471 price observations; 470 monthly log-returns), the study compares three GARCH-family conditional-variance models of increasing flexibility – symmetric GARCH(1,1), EGARCH(1,1) and GJR-GARCH(1,1), each with Student-t innovations – against a single-layer Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network built and validated from first principles. Descriptive statistics show pronounced excess kurtosis (9.06) and negative skewness (−0.49), with the Jarque-Bera statistic (719.84, p<.001) decisively rejecting normality. The Brent price level is non-stationary (ADF t = −1.72) while its return series is stationary (ADF t = −9.02), and both the Ljung-Box test on squared returns (Q = 210.00, p<.001) and the ARCH-LM test (LM = 171.78, p<.001) confirm strong volatility clustering. Formal structural-break tests at two independently documented oil-market events – the November 2014 OPEC non-cut decision and the March 2020 COVID-19 demand collapse – each find a highly significant post-break increase in return variance (F = 2.034 and F = 2.552, both p<.001) but no significant shift in the mean return (p = .616 and p = .839). Fitted on an 80% training window (n = 376), EGARCH(1,1) achieves the best in-sample fit by AIC (2653.32) while GARCH(1,1) achieves the best BIC (2675.44); neither asymmetric model's leverage coefficient is statistically significant (EGARCH γ = −0.063, t = −1.16; GJR-GARCH γ = 0.111, t = 0.98), although EGARCH's negative sign is stable across an independent post-2015 robustness re-fit. On a 94-month out-of-sample test window, EGARCH(1,1) achieves the lowest RMSE (427.77) and MAE (149.88), GJR-GARCH(1,1) the lowest Theil's U (0.529), and the LSTM the lowest MAPE (272.89%); a Diebold-Mariano test comparing EGARCH against the LSTM is not statistically significant (DM = −1.067, p = .286). The study concludes that Brent crude oil price volatility is highly persistent and asymmetric in sign, though not significantly so, and that a well-specified asymmetric GARCH model remains competitive with, and is not clearly outperformed by, a deep-learning alternative, a finding of direct relevance to Nigerian fiscal and reserve-management planning.
Downloads
References
Abdulkareem, A., & Abdulkareem, K. A. (2016). Analysing oil price-macroeconomic volatility in Nigeria. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics, 7(1), 1–22.
Adams, S. O. (2024). Asymmetric GARCH type models and LSTM for volatility characteristics analysis of Nigeria stock exchange returns. American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 14(2).
Adams, S. O., & Uchema, J. I. (2024). Nigeria exchange rate volatility: A comparative study of RNN-LSTM and EGARCH models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, 4(2), 61–73.
Adegboyo, O. S., & Sarwar, K. (2025). Modelling and forecasting of Nigeria stock market volatility. Future Business Journal, 11(1), Article 124.
Ben Romdhane, W., & Boubaker, H. (2026). A hybrid HAR-LSTM-GARCH model for forecasting volatility in energy markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(1), Article 77.
Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327.
Box, G. E. P., & Tiao, G. C. (1975). Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(349), 70–79.
Chow, G. C. (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica, 28(3), 591–605.
Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(3), 253–263.
Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1007.
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2026). Global price of Brent Crude Oil [MCOILBRENTEU]. FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MCOILBRENTEU
Fu, X. (2023). Oil price forecasting model based on GARCH-LSTM model. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 10(3), 28–31.
Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. The Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1779–1801.
Hamilton, J. D. (1983). Oil and the macroeconomy since World War II. Journal of Political Economy, 91(2), 228–248.
Hamilton, J. D. (2003). What is an oil shock? Journal of Econometrics, 113(2), 363–398.
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.
Kim, H. Y., & Won, C. H. (2018). Forecasting the volatility of stock price index: A hybrid model integrating LSTM with multiple GARCH-type models. Expert Systems with Applications, 103, 25–37.
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
Lo, A. W. (2004). The adaptive markets hypothesis: Market efficiency from an evolutionary perspective. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(5), 15–29.
Mgbomene, C., Ashakah, F. O., Metieh, F. C., Okoro, E. N., Dim, H. C., & Opara, F. N. (2025). Crude oil price volatility and the Nigerian economy. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 15(3), 390–402.
Micheal, N. O., & Anono, Z. M. (2025). Modelling and forecasting the volatility of the exchange rate between the US dollar and the Nigeria naira note. International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, 10(8), 276–286.
Mwanakatwe, P. K., Daniel, J., & Nzungu, K. R. (2023). Forecasting crude oil price volatility by Heston model. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 13(3), 408–420.
Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347–370.
Ng, K. Y., Zainal, Z., Samsudin, S., & Wei, H. (2025). Taming the turbulence: Modelling and forecasting crude oil price volatility with GARCH and SARIMA models. Journal of Science and Technology, 17(2), 48–63.
Nsengiyumva, E., Mung'atu, J. K., & Ruranga, C. (2025). Hybrid GARCH-LSTM forecasting for foreign exchange risk. FinTech, 4(2), Article 22.
Ozokede, E. V., & Awogbemi, T. O. (2025). The impact of crude oil price volatility on economic growth in Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(9), 7385–7396.
Peltzman, S. (2000). Prices rise faster than they fall. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 466–502.
Salisu, Z.-A., Dikko, H. G., & Doguwa, S. I. (2022). Comparing different symmetric and asymmetric GARCH models in three error distributions using Nigerian crude oil export prices. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research, 8(10), 108–134.
Sekati, B. N. Y., Tsoku, J. T., Metsileng, L. D., & Tokic, D. (2020). Modelling the oil price volatility and macroeconomic variables in South Africa using the symmetric and asymmetric GARCH models. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), Article 1792153.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2026). Europe Brent spot price FOB (compiled by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis as FRED series MCOILBRENTEU). U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MCOILBRENTEU
Zubair, M. A., & Boyi, B. A. (2025). Modelling the volatility of cotton and rubber stock returns in Nigeria using GARCH type models. FUDMA Journal of Sciences, 9(5), 67–79.
Zubair, M. A., Adams, S. O., & Aniagolu, K. S. (2022). Economic impact of some determinant factors of Nigerian inflation rate. Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis, 5(2), 23–41.
The authors and co-authors warrant that the article is their original work, does not infringe any copyright, and has not been published elsewhere. By submitting the article to GPH - International Journal of Mathematics, the authors agree that the journal has the right to retract or remove the article in case of proven ethical misconduct.


















