Impact of Spinal Cord Injury on women’s daily life

  • Sanzida Solaiman Senior Clinical Physiotherapist, Department of Physiotherapy, Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP), Dhaka -1343
  • Obaidul Haque Professor of Physiotherapy, Bangladesh Health Professions Institute (BHPI);
  • Nadia Afrin Urme Lecturer, Bangladesh Health Professions Institute (BHPI)
  • Md. Akhlasur Rahman Junior Consultant of physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, CRP, Dhaka -1343
  • Md. Liton Miah Clinical Physiotherapist, Department of Physiotherapy, Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP), Dhaka -1343
  • Muzaffor Hossain Consultatnt, Department of Physiotherapy, Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP), Dhaka -1343
  • Shahid Afridi Lecturer, SAIC College of Medical Science and Technology (SCMST), Mirpur-14, Dhaka- 1216 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9558-5640
  • Dr. Syeda Sushmita Zafar Assistant Professor, SAIC College of Medical Science and Technology (SCMST), Mirpur-14, Dhaka- 1216
  • Rubaya Sultana Development Studies, Islamic University, Kushtia
Keywords: Spinal Cord Injury, Women, Activity Limitation, Environmental Barrier, Life Satisfaction

Abstract

Objectives:To find out the activity limitation, environmental barrier, and life satisfaction of women with spinal cord injury. Methodology:This was a cross-sectional study. The Savar Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP) provided 100 participants with spinal cord injuries for this study. Questionnaires were used to tally responses on measures like the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) for gauging activity limitations, the Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors- Short Form (CHIEF-SF) for gauging environmental barriers, and the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) for measuring happiness. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 26.0's descriptive statistics features, specifically Columns, pie charts, and bar graphs. Result:Most of the 101 people who had spinal cord damage were paralyzed. The average age of the people who took part was 32.21 years (±12.76 years). 24.8% of the participants (n=26) live in cities, while 75.2% (n=75) live in rural areas. There were significant (p=.001) links between age group and activity limitation, age group and environmental barrier, types of injury and activity limitation, and types of injury and life happiness. There was no link between age group and life satisfaction (p=.097) or between types of injuries and external barriers (p=.265). Conclusion:Women with spinal cord injuries who live independently in the community provide a thorough description of the multifaceted nature of activity limitation, participation restriction, life satisfaction, and the impact of SCI in this study. When contrasted to the other article, it becomes clear that women with SCI are disproportionately affected by the condition. The conclusion was explored at length, and it was backed by the other papers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. World Health Organization. (2013). Disability and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health
2. Kumar, N., & Gupta, A. (2016). Rehabilitation of Spinal Cord Injuries. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 72(2), 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2015.06.011
3. Razzak, J. A., Helal, U., & Nuri, K. W. (2011). Spinal cord injury in developing countries: a review of the literature. Spinal cord, 49(8), 841-845. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.36
4. Vincent, H. K., Chan, L., & Carruthers, K. J. (2014). Obesity and weight loss improve mobility following knee or hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Rheumatology, 33(12), 1863-1870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2781-9
5. Islam, M. S., Hafez, M. A., &Akter, F. (2011). Spinal Cord Injury in Bangladesh. International Journal of Neurology Research, 3(2), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.12691/ijnr-3-2-1
6. Wu, Y., Channon, S. B., Smith, P. B., &Sheps, S. (2012). The Economic Burden of Spinal Cord Injury in Canada: A Population-Based Study. Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada, 32(3), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.05.019
7. DESA. (2010). World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2010_Highlights.pdf
8. Vasiliadis, H. M. (2012). Epidemiology of Spinal Cord Injury in Quebec and Canada. Healthcare Quarterly, 15(3), 22-24. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2012.22908
9. Geyh, S., Kunz, S., Müller, R., & Peter, C. (2016). Health-related quality of life among people with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 61(4), 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000101
10. Tulsky, D. S., Kisala, P. A., Tate, D. G., Spungen, A. M., Kirshblum, S. C., Forchheimer, M. B., & Marino, R. J. (2015). Measuring depression after spinal cord injury: Development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Depression item bank and linkage with PHQ-9. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 38(3), 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772315y.0000000016
11. Jorgensen, V., Butler Forslund, E., Opheim, A., Franzén, E., & Dahlberg, L. E. (2016). Life satisfaction in individuals with a spinal cord injury and pain. Spinal Cord, 54(11), 1036-1042. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2016.80
12. Tonack, M., Kairy, D., Archambault, P., &Faria-Fortini, I. (2018). Cardiometabolic health and physical activity in adults with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 56(11), 1067-1074. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-018-0140-9
13. Callaway, L., Biering-Sørensen, F., & Nielsen, J. B. (2016). Activity-based rehabilitation: strengths, challenges, and future directions. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 40(2), 80-88.
14. Kratz, A. (2015). The role of physical therapy in enhancing participation after spinal cord injury. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 3(2), 132-140.
15. Singh, R., Rohilla, R. K., Siwach, R., & Kaur, M. (2013). Demographic profile of patients with spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 47(5), 472-477.
16. Otom, A. S. (2017). Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Jordan. Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 22(3), 195-199.
17. Razzak, J. A., Shamim, M. S., Mehmood, A., Hussain, S. A., Ali, S. Z., &Jooma, R. (2016). Spinal cord injury in Pakistan: a review. Spinal Cord, 54(4), 266-271.
18. Divanoglou, A. (2018). Spinal cord injuries in Greece: epidemiological data from a population-based registry. The European Journal of Public Health, 28(1), 46-50.
19. Weld, K. J., &Dmochowski, R. R. (2012). Effect of spinal cord injury on female sexuality: a critical review. Journal of Urology, 187(4), 1387-1393.
20. Hossain, M. S., Rahman, M. H., Biswas, R. K., & Islam, S. (2020). Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Bangladesh: a population-based study. Spinal Cord, 58(10), 1119-1126.
21. Rahman, M. H., Biswas, R. K., Hossain, M. S., & Islam, S. (2017). Epidemiology and etiology of spinal cord injury in Bangladesh: a systematic review. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 40(3), 261-267.
22. Kader, M., Yalcin, S., &Simsek, M. E. (2018). Physical therapy management of spinal cord injuries: an overview of systematic reviews. Spinal Cord, 56(8), 723-731.
23. Jørgensen, V., Butler Forslund, E., Opheim, A., &Franzén, E. (2016). Clinical guidelines for physical therapy in patients with spinal cord injury. Physical Therapy, 96(2), 151-171.
Published
2024-08-04
How to Cite
Solaiman, S., Haque, O., Urme, N., Rahman, M. A., Miah, M. L., Hossain, M., Afridi, S., Sushmita Zafar, D. S., & Sultana, R. (2024). Impact of Spinal Cord Injury on women’s daily life. GPH-International Journal of Biological & Medicine Science, 7(07), 01-08. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13208674