ELECTRICITY PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN PT. PLN (PERSERO) SAMARINDA CITY WITH CUSTOMERS

Abstract

In order for the community to get electricity, they must subscribe to electricity with PT. PLN (PERSERO). The electricity subscription is contained in the agreement, namely the Power Purchase Agreement (SPJBTL) in the form of a standard agreement and the agreement has been determined and made unilaterally by PT. PLN (PERSERO). The standard agreement allows for problems in practice in the field, such as turning on the electricity supply, slowing down the rotation of the meter. In this case, it is an act of default which is detrimental to PT. PLN (PERSERO).

The purpose of the study was to determine: (1) the form of the electricity purchase agreement made by PT. PLN (PERSERO) UP3 Samarinda with customers; and (2) the legal consequences of the power purchase agreement between PT. PLN (PERSERO) UP3 Samarinda with customers if one party defaults,

The type of research used is normative juridical research, the problem approach used in writing this thesis is the statutory approach (Statueaproach).

The results of the study show that: (1) the Power Purchase Agreement (SPJBTL) at PT. PLN (PERSERO) UP3 Samarinda, is a standard contract or standard agreement, due to the availability of the terms of the agreement and the consumer just agrees to it. However, the agreement for the electricity bill and the late fee, PT. PLN (PERSERO) will use this standard to invite default between one of the parties. Therefore, the agreement contains the rights and obligations between the two parties, as they are required to submit to and comply with the agreement along with the forms of violations and sanctions; (2) The customer pays the electricity bill no later than the 20th of every month if the customer has not carried out his obligations, a late fee will also be charged. Furthermore, if the customer cannot pay the fee, he will make a temporary termination.