• Ephraim Chukwu Depertment of English and Literature, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria
  • Chinwe Innocentia Ahumaraeze Directorate of General Studies, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria
Keywords: Semiotics, Semiotic Resources, Modes, Multimodality, Social Semiotic Approach, Cosmetic Advertising


In recent times, there has been a shift away from monomodal communication that depends on language (spoken and written) as the only available meaning-making resource. Advances in technology have given rise to multiliteracies that employ a wide repertoire of modes of communication. Media communication, thus, has become multimodal given its penchant for the fusion of multiple modes as meaning-making resources. It is against this backdrop that this study explores the semiotic resources used in cosmetic advertising. It foregrounds the use and interaction of verbal and visual modes as components of advertising discourse. The paper argues that aside from language, there are many other meaning-making resources advertisers use to persuade and influence their target audience. The researchers adopt the social semiotic approach of Kress and van Leeuwen (2006) as an aspect of the multimodality framework. This approach stipulates that there are multiple modes of signification and representation which include language, visual, aural, spatial, and gestural modes. The study, thus, sets out to explore all meaning-making resources in cosmetic advertisements and their manipulative apparatus for appealing to the target audience. The research adopts the descriptive qualitative method of data analysis to examine five advertisements from the internet sites of Nuban and Zaron cosmetic brands. Data were analyzed using the tenets of multimodality and semiotics. The study finds out that other modes of representation like colour, gaze, visuals, frames, gesture, angle of interaction, information value as well as text are embodiments of meaning which combine to make ads more compelling, catchy, and irresistible. The paper then concludes that though there are meaning potentials in these multiple modes, their use and exploration should be craftily mastered so as to produce texts that are coherent, meaningful, and persuasive.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ephraim Chukwu, Depertment of English and Literature, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria

Depertment of English and Literature, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria

Chinwe Innocentia Ahumaraeze, Directorate of General Studies, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria

Directorate of General Studies, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria


Adham, S. A. (2012). A semiotic analysis of the iconic representations of women in the Middle Eastern media. Unpublished MA Thesis, Department of English, The University of Birmingham.
Ali, S. & Ullah, Z. (2015). Semiotic insights into cosmetic advertisements in Parkistani print media. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies. 2 (1), 689-207.
Allot, R. (1994). Language and the origin of semiosis. In North Wnifred (Ed). Sign evolution in nature and culture. Part II Glottogeness; phylogeny, ontogeny and octogeny. 255-268. Berlin; Mouton de Gruyter.
Arens, W.F., Weigold, M.W. & Arens, C. (2013). Contemporary advertising and integrated marketing communication (4th Edition). Irwin: McGraw-Hill.
Barthes, R. (1964). Elements of semiologie. Communication 4, Seuil: Paris.
Baykal, N. (2016). Multimodal construction of female lookss : An analysis of mascara advertisement. Dilbilim Arastirmaleri Dergisi (2) 39-59.
Brummett, B. (2006). Rhetoric in popular culture. United Kingdom: Sage.
Chandler, D. (1994). Semiotics for beginners. Retrieved from http://www.aber.acuk/media/documents/S4b/on August 10, 2021.
Cobley, P. (2010). (Ed.). The Routledge companion to semiotics. London and New York; Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th Edition). United Kingdom: Blackwell.
Danesi, M. (2004). Messages, signs and meanings: A basic textbook in semiotics and communication. 3rd Edtion. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press (2010) Semiotics of Media and Culture. In P Cobley (Ed). .). The Routledge companion to semiotics. 135-149. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Dirven, R. & Vespoor, M. (1999). Cognitieve inleiding tot taal en taalwetenschap. Nederland: Uitgeverij Acco.
Dunn, S., Barban, A. M., Kingman, D. M. & Reid, L. N. (1990). Advertising: Its role in modern marketing (7th edidion). Chicago: The Drydeen Press.
Dyer, G. (2009). Advertisement as communication. London: Taylor and Francis.
Essays Uk. (2018). Roland Barthes and his semiotic theory. Retrieved from https://www. Ukessays . com son June 10, 2021.
Farida, V. N. (2020). A Semiotic study of foundation product Vide advertisement. Unpublished Theses. Department of English, Faculty of Arts and Humanities. UIN SUNAN AMPUL SURABAYA
Fillmore A. (nd). Multiple modal communication: Writing in five modes. Retrieved from https://openlisl.atslcc.pressbooks.com/chapter/multi- modal-communication-writing -in-five-modes/on August 10, 2021.
Gorlee, D. (1994). Semiotics and the problem of translation. Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi.
Gurdin, J. E. (1994). The dialogic and the semiotic: Bakhtin, Volosinov, Peirce and sociolinguistics. Arizona Anthropologist. 11,57-69. Tucson : University of Arizona.
Hodge, R. & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. New York: Cornel University Press.
Jewitt, C. & Oyama, R. (2001). Visual meanings: A social semiotic approach. In T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (Eds). Handbook of visual meaning .P.134- Retrieved from http://www.books.google.com/books? Id=DkqW4aAn/BAG.
Jewitt, C. (2017). Multimodal discourse across the curriculum in S. Throne and S. May (Eds). Language, Education and Technology Encyclopedia of language and Education (3rd edition). Cambridge: Springer.
Kenechukwu, S.A., Asemah , E.S. & Edegoh, L. O.N. (2013). Behind Advertising: The language of persuasion. International Journal of Asian Social Science. 3 (4), 951-959.
Kress G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.— (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes of media in contemporary communication London: Holder Arnold. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd Edition). London: Routeledge. (2021) Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd Edition). London: Routeledge.
Kruti, S. & Alan, D. (2009). Advertising and promotion. An Imc perspectives. New Delhi: Tata Mcgraw Hill Publishing Company Limited.

Liu, Y. & O’Halloran, K. (2009). Intersemiotic texture: Analysing cohesive devices between language and images. Social semiotics. (19(4). 367-388.
Machin, D. (2007). Introduction to multimode analysis. London: Arnold.
Menhof, U. (2004). Readings (S): From the street to the screen. Breadline Britain and the semiotics of poverty. In Yates. S.J and Yates S. (Eds). Doing social science Research .263- 273.London: Sage.
Najafian, M. & Ketabi, S. (2011). The words behind images: A critical semiotic approach toward analyzing advertising. International Journal of Linguistics. 3(1). 1- 21— (2011b). Advertising social semiotic representation: A critical approach. International Journal of Industrial Marketing. 1(1) 63-78
National Open University Nigeria (nd). Semiotics. Retrieved on Septtember 10 2021 from www.com
Randviir, A. & Cobley, P. (2010). Sociosemiotics. In P. Cobley (Ed). The Routledge companion to semiotic. 118-134. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Rubio del Saz, M. (2018). A multimodal approach to the analysis of gender stereotypes in contemporary British tv commercials: Woman and Men at work. In Poznan studies in contemporary linguistics 54(2)). 185-221.
Sabri, H. (2019). Use of indexical, iconic and symbolic signs in cosmetic advertising: A Charles Sanders Peirce Semiotic. International Journal of Science Technology and Management. Vol 8 (8) 24-34.
Sari, C. D. A. (2017). Semiotic analysis of idiomatic expressions found in the Hunger Games. The Mockingjay part 1 movie and the implications to English Language skills. Unpublished thesis. Surakarta: IAIN Suakarta.
Tehseem, Tr & Kalsooom, U, (2015. Exploring the veiled ideology in cosmetic advertising : A feminist perspective. European Journal of Research in social Sciences. 3 (2), 81-99.
The New London Group (1996} A pedagogy of multi-literacies. Designing social futures.Harvard Educational Review 66:60-92.
van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London and New York: Routledge.
Van Niekerki, A. (2018). The use of indexical signs, symbols and icons in print advertising and communication. Doi.https//dx.doi.org/10.18820/24150525/commv23.7. 108-12
Widyahening, C.E.T & Hum, S.S. (2015). The role of language in advertisement. The 35th anniversary Slamet Riyadi University. UNISRI solo, 70-75. Retrieved from https://media . neliti.com7media7publication7…pdf.
Williamson, J. (1978). Decoding advertising: Ideology and meaning in advertising. London: Marion Boyars.
How to Cite
Chukwu, E., & Ahumaraeze, C. (2022). UNPACKING SEMIOTIC RESOURCES IN COSMETIC ADVERTISEMENTS. GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 5(05), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6767870