• C. R. Okonya-Chukwu Department of Agricultural Extension; Federal University of Technology, Owerri
Keywords: agroforestry practices, rural farmers, Perceived effect, Welfare


This study determined the perceived effect of agroforestry practices on the welfare of rural farmers in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Agroforestry practices has the potentials to improve the environment and welfare status of the farmers. Hence the study ascertained the benefits derivable from agroforestry  practices, the perceived welfare status of the rural farmers, and determined the perceived effects of agroforestry practices on the welfare of rural farmers. The hypothesis tested is; agroforestry practices have no significant perceived effect on the welfare status of the rural farmers. Multistage sampling technique was used in the selection of agroforestry farmers. A total of 351 farmers were sampled using structured questionnaire. Data obtained were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The result showed that taungya farming (76.9%) and home garden (72.1%) were the dominant agroforestry systems practiced. The result on the benefits of agroforestry practices showed that the entire agroforestry farmers (100.0%) agreed that they use agroforestry for environmental protection and soil conservation, 99.7% indicated that it provided fodder for the livestock and 99.4% agreed that it provided them with fuel wood (firewood). Become independent ( = 3.2), have sufficient income to meet household needs ( = 3.2), and ability to afford three-square meal in a day ( = 3.3) were the dominant perceived welfare status of the agroforestry farmers. The bivariate regression result showed that agroforestry practices (x) had significant effect on the welfare status of the farmers. In conclusion, thepractices of agroforestry was perceived to have imparted positively on the welfare of the farmers. The study therefore, recommended that the farmers should be encouraged to continue to practice agroforestry and even expand their farms since by doing so, their welfare status is enhanced.


Download data is not yet available.


Amare, M., Cisse, J.D., Jensen, N.D. &Shiferaw, B. (2011). The impact of agricultural productivity on welfare growth on farm households in Nigeria: a panel data analysis.
Amonum, J.I., Babalolo, F.D., &Agera, S.I.N. (2015).Agroforestry systems in Nigeria: review of concepts practices.Retrieved 24th November, 2018, from
Bakengesa, S.S. (2001). Influence of national policies on tree planting and conservation: The case of agroforestry technologies in Shinyanga, Tanzania. In: the proceedings of the Regional Agroforestry Centre on Agroforestry Impacts on Livelihoods in Southern Africa: Putting Research into Practice.
Brucks, T. (2003). Household cropping choice and the determinants of income and consumption in post war rural Mozambique. A paper submitted at the European Economic Association Annual Meeting in Stockholm.
De Baets, N., Gariepy, S., &Vezina, A. (2007).Portrait of agroforestry in Quebec.Government of Canada.https:// ?hl=en&as-sdt=0%2c5/as- vis=1&q=de+baets
Greeve, B. (2008). What is welfare? Central European Journal of Public Policy, 2(1), 51 – 72.
Gross-Camp, N. (2017). Tanzania’s community forests: their impact on human well-being and persistence in spite of the lack of benefit. Ecology and Society, 22(1), 37pp.
ICRAF, (1997).International Centre for Research on Agroforestry.Medium Term Plan 1998 – 2000, 1 -5p.
Khot, S. (1999).Socioeconomic aspects of agroforestry adopted by BAIF.Unpublished electronic version.BAIF Development Research Foundation.
Mbow, C., Noordwijk, M.V., Luedeling, E. Neufeldt, H., Minang, P.A., &Kowero, G. (2013). Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa. Environmental Sustainability, 61 – 67.
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), (2016).Annual Abstracts of Statistics Volume 1.Pp. 37.
National Population Commission (NPC), (2006). Landmass Compiled from NPC Report 1991 and Field Reports; Nigerian Agricultural Magazine, 4(3), 22pp. August/September, 2000.
Nigerian Metrological Agency (NIMET), (2017).Evidence of climate change.Climate Change Review Bulletin 2017, pp.2-12.Nigeria Metrological Agency (NiMet), Abuja.
Rancane, S., Makovskis, K., Ladzina, D., Daugaviete, M., Gutmane, I., &Berzins, R. (2014).Analysis of economic, social and environmental aspects of agroforestry systems of trees and perennial herbaceous plants.Agronomy Research, 12, 589 – 602.
Ravallion, M. (2002).Measuring aggregate welfare in developing well do National Accounts and Surveys agree? World Bank Working Group, Washington, D.C, pp. 2665.
Soboola, O.O., &Amadi, D. (2015).The role of agroforestry in environmental sustainability.IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 8(5), 20 – 25.
Thondhlana, G., &Muchapondwa, E. (2014). Dependence on environmental resources and implications for household welfare: Evidence from the Kalahari Drylands, South Africa. Journal Ecological Economics 108, 59-67
Tiwari, P., Kumar, R., Thakur, L., & Salve, A. (2017). Agroforestry for sustainable rural livelihood: a review. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience, 5(1), 299 – 309.
How to Cite
Okonya-Chukwu, C. R. (2022). DETERMINATION OF THE PERCEIVED EFFECT OF AGROFORESTRY PRACTICES ON THE WELFARE STATUS OF THE RURAL FARMERS IN EBONYI STATE, NIGERIA. GPH-International Journal of Agriculture and Research E-ISSN 2805-4362 P-ISSN 2805-4340, 5(08), 42-48.